On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 18:32 -0500, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Worst case, I'd have to ask for some input to complete the merge
> accurately but I don't think bringovercheck and sccscheck would be
> that bad to merge in (unless I'm missing something).
so, the following webrev is not yet tested but is r
Bill Sommerfeld writes:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:14 -0800, Mike Kupfer wrote:
>> > "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld writes:
>>
>> Bill> Last I checked, the bugs that spawned bringovercheck have pretty
>> Bill> much all been slain, so it could be retired now even for teamware.
>>
>> If there's s
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:14 -0800, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld writes:
>
> Bill> Last I checked, the bugs that spawned bringovercheck have pretty
> Bill> much all been slain, so it could be retired now even for teamware.
>
> If there's stuff that can be done now and it
Mike Kupfer writes:
>> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld writes:
>
> Bill> Last I checked, the bugs that spawned bringovercheck have pretty
> Bill> much all been slain, so it could be retired now even for teamware.
>
> If there's stuff that can be done now and it doesn't depend on the other
> SCM Mi
Mike Kupfer writes:
>> "JimW" == Jim Walker writes:
>
> Bill> what I think would make sense would be to set a different,
> Bill> non-teamware-specific variable. So a teamware workspace would get
> Bill> CODEMGR_WS and the TBD additional variable; mercurial would just get
> Bill> the TBD add
> "Rich" == Richard Lowe writes:
Bill> usr/src/tools/Makefile.tools:
Bill>
Bill> WES-14 Lines 66-73: might INS.pyfile belong in Makefile.master (we're
Bill> going to have python elsewhere in ON at some point, right?)
Rich> I wasn't sure what to do about that, so I took the more localized
Ric
> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld writes:
Bill> Last I checked, the bugs that spawned bringovercheck have pretty
Bill> much all been slain, so it could be retired now even for teamware.
If there's stuff that can be done now and it doesn't depend on the other
SCM Migration changes, I'd rather that
> "JimW" == Jim Walker writes:
Bill> what I think would make sense would be to set a different,
Bill> non-teamware-specific variable. So a teamware workspace would get
Bill> CODEMGR_WS and the TBD additional variable; mercurial would just get
Bill> the TBD additional variable.
JimW> The adv
Richard Lowe writes:
> Bill Sommerfeld writes:
> > what I think would make sense would be to set a different,
> > non-teamware-specific variable. So a teamware workspace would get
> > CODEMGR_WS and the TBD additional variable; mercurial would just get the
> > TBD additional variable.
>
> I'll l
Bill Sommerfeld writes:
>> > WES-3 Should we set CODEMGR_WS in the non-teamware case?
>>
>> We've been back and forth a few times on the use of CODEMGR_WS, my
>> view (which I think was shared by stevel) is that CODEMGR_WS, while
>> originally used by and for teamware, has effectively become g
> > WES-3 Should we set CODEMGR_WS in the non-teamware case?
>
> We've been back and forth a few times on the use of CODEMGR_WS, my
> view (which I think was shared by stevel) is that CODEMGR_WS, while
> originally used by and for teamware, has effectively become generic at
> this point, and th
> Bill Sommerfeld writes:
WES-3 Should we set CODEMGR_WS in the non-teamware case?
>>> We've been back and forth a few times on the use of CODEMGR_WS, my
>>> view (which I think was shared by stevel) is that CODEMGR_WS, while
>>> originally used by and for teamware, has effectively become g
Bill Sommerfeld writes:
> Jim Carlson asked me to review what I could of the big webrev at:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kupfer/onnv-scm/
I'm probably going to have more comments on these, but I'm going to
respond to those I can respond to quickly now.
> This is my initial batch of comments
Jim Carlson asked me to review what I could of the big webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kupfer/onnv-scm/
This is my initial batch of comments, focussing on changes to existing
scripts in reverse alphabetical order..
usr/src/tools/scripts/xref.sh:
WES-1 detect_scm(): shouldn't this be i
14 matches
Mail list logo
