If each of these small changes requires some time foe testing and time for
review, then it is better to schedule that with separate pull requests. If
these are trivial, it is more convenient to merge it in one bunch.
--
anatoly t.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:16 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.comwrote:
If each of these small changes requires some time foe testing and time for
review, then it is better to schedule that with separate pull requests. If
these are trivial, it is more convenient to merge it in one bunch.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:11 AM, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
By the way, did you review mine? (
https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-request/86/fix-http-sconstigrisorg-issues/diff
)
I saw it, Alexandre -- it's definitely in the queue, and on simple
inspection it looks OK. I
I used the test case described in the bug, but I have nothing to integrate in
scons test suite.
Le 26 sept. 2013 à 14:16, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:11 AM, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
By the way, did you review mine? (
Here's the wiki page for the mercurial flow for submitting bugs.
http://www.scons.org/wiki/SconsMercurialWorkflows
-Bill
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:22 AM, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
I used the test case described in the bug, but I have nothing to integrate
in scons test suite.
Le 26
