Re: [Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

Dirk, Trying to figure out a way we can avoid the spam problem we've had so far. I think a pull request flow would be a more visible implementation of the approveChanges configuration we have currently. So maybe it would be more community documentation rather than wiki. (effectively the same, bu

Re: [Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

Bill, On 12.12.2014 00:52, Bill Deegan wrote: I'm thinking a hg repo and some sort of ci to process it when new changes come in. Or use readthedocs.org (It has integration with bitbucket for such already) That way users and do pull requests and also the webserver only

[Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

I'm thinking a hg repo and some sort of ci to process it when new changes come in. Or use readthedocs.org (It has integration with bitbucket for such already) That way users and do pull requests and also the webserver only has to handle serving static pages. Is it reasonable to expect that users

Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki is down

Yes. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Anatoly, > > So you're talking about how it looks? > > -Bill > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:38 AM, anatoly techtonik > wrote: >> >> I am saying that design matters and BitBucket design is much much >> worse that current moin. >> >> On Th

Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki is down

Anatoly, So you're talking about how it looks? -Bill On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:38 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I am saying that design matters and BitBucket design is much much > worse that current moin. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Bill Deegan > wrote: > > Anatoly, > > > > I'm not

Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki is down

I am saying that design matters and BitBucket design is much much worse that current moin. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Anatoly, > > I'm not sure I understand, are you saying that moin moin is the only wiki > solution which would work for us? > > -Bill > > On Wed, Dec 10,