Re: [Scons-dev] Mercurial remote tracking

2016-02-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 21:57 +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > […] >> Catching magical bugs from merges that join code that was too far >> away causes much more extra work than just rebasing your branch. >> What kind of extra work can be cau

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:57 AM, William Blevins wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: >> >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is an interesting thread, which needs some >>> consensus. >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/scon

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > @Vasily: It's okay for the script to be clearly visible, that's the whole > point about it. Users that need it for their migration tasks should be able > to find it with the least amount of effort. They already have to do some > "silly" migrati