Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released

2016-04-10 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello, great work. :-) And already at Debian unstable. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

2016-04-10 Thread William Blevins
That sounds fine to me. On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > Here's what I propose. > 1. Merge scons_python3 down to default. It's o.k if it's broken for a > bit. We can always do bug fixes out of rel_2.5.0 branch if needed and merge > those down. > 2. I'm o.k. with ma

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

2016-04-10 Thread Bill Deegan
All, Here's what I propose. 1. Merge scons_python3 down to default. It's o.k if it's broken for a bit. We can always do bug fixes out of rel_2.5.0 branch if needed and merge those down. 2. I'm o.k. with many tests failing when merged down to default. Python 2/3 is a major project and move forward

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

2016-04-10 Thread William Blevins
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 13:02 +0100, William Blevins wrote: > > Two Questions, > > > > 1. Are we working out of scons__python3 or merging scons__python3 and > > working there? > > With SCons 2.5.0 released and a maintenance branch created, thi

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

2016-04-10 Thread Russel Winder
On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 13:02 +0100, William Blevins wrote: > Two Questions, > > 1. Are we working out of scons__python3 or merging scons__python3 and > working there? With SCons 2.5.0 released and a maintenance branch created, this is a most pertinent question. :-) I  > 2. Many of the failing tes

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

2016-04-10 Thread William Blevins
Two Questions, 1. Are we working out of scons__python3 or merging scons__python3 and working there? 2. Many of the failing tests are from embedded code blocks in the tests which futurize and six didn't update automatically. Should the update process here be "make the embedded code its own file wh

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

2016-04-10 Thread Russel Winder
The python3-port currently has: 47 test fails 108 no results running the tests using Python 2.7.11 on Fedora Rawhide. The tests don't really start using Python 3.5.1 because of stuff to do with UserDict. I believe the Python 3 stuff can actually wait until the tests all pass using Python 2. The