Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

If they were hard coded by the original author then its fine. I was assumed they hadn't been rebuilt since his 2.4.1 changes. I suppose that is his Easter Egg. On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Dirk, > > Is it fairly simple to replace that text so

Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

Dirk, Is it fairly simple to replace that text so all the paths are uniform? (As part of the build process?) Thanks, Bill On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > William, > > On 16.04.2016 22:43, William Blevins wrote: > >> Bill, >> >>

Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

William, On 16.04.2016 22:43, William Blevins wrote: Bill, http://scons.org/doc/production/HTML/scons-user.html Just search for ptomulik; it's everywhere. I count 6 occurrences...which doesn't qualify as "everywhere" to me. ;) Even more important, those strings are simply given in the

Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

Bill, http://scons.org/doc/production/HTML/scons-user.html Just search for ptomulik; it's everywhere. V/R, William On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > William, > > Can you point me to a specific URL so I can investigate? > It should regenerate on

[Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

Bill, It looks like the SCons 2.5.0 User Guide wasn't rebuilt on the release server because the examples have ptomulik in the directory paths. I'm not sure if this is an issue or not, but shouldn't our release system always regenerate the documentation? This is a bit worrisome because it suggests