Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

>> After all, there is a very important (in my opinion) distinction to be made >> between SCons and other build tools like the autotools or CMake: Just want to second that Scons, make, ninja, msbuild are items to compare. The idea of comparing CMake, Meson or autotools to SCons in incorrect.

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

Hi there, On 21.07.2017 17:39, Andrew C. Morrow wrote: Hi scons-dev - The following is a revised draft of an email that I had originally intended to send as a follow up to https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/2017-June/006018.html. Instead, Bill Deegan and I took some time to

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > > On 24.07.2017 23:29, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> As Jason said, if you run a profile on a reasonable sized build the >> MD5'ing doesn't really show much % of runtime. >> >> > Unless your project is called "MongoDB". ;) >

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

On 24.07.2017 23:29, Bill Deegan wrote: As Jason said, if you run a profile on a reasonable sized build the MD5'ing doesn't really show much % of runtime. Unless your project is called "MongoDB". ;) Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list