Re: [Scons-dev] SCons distro package maintainers?

I was querying if any of the scons package maintainers were on the list. I'm aware of the links on the various distro sites to the listed package maintainers. :) On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > For Debian the maintainers are listed here

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 3.0, sconsign files and Py2 vs Py3.. how to handle sconsign imcompatabilities

It doesn't look as if PICKLE_PROTOCOL is changeable during the SConscript phase so that might be an idea for a future version of scons Keeping it at 2 for scons 3.0 sounds like a good idea There's a couple of settings of src\engine\SCons\compat\__init__.py PICKLE_PROTOCOL =

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 3.0, sconsign files and Py2 vs Py3.. how to handle sconsign imcompatabilities

Okay so changing pickle.loads(p) to pickle.loads(p, encoding='bytes') seems like a partial fix if there's a .sconsign.dblite file saved in python 2 with pickle protocol 2 python 3 won't crash now, instead it'll just rebuild the sources / ignore the current state going the opposite way from

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 3.0, sconsign files and Py2 vs Py3.. how to handle sconsign imcompatabilities

How many projects will switch back and forth between Python 2 and Python 3. I cannot imagine many. People with either stick or move. I would argue making work to cater for a very small number of people is not cost effective. I would therefore stick with what I think is the status quo. A build is

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons distro package maintainers?

For Debian the maintainers are listed here https://tracker.debian.org/p kg/scons For Fedora see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/scons / On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 14:00 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > Any people who manage scons distro packages on the list? > > -Bill > SCons Project