Hi All -
With the SCons 3.0 release and GitHub migration completed (huge
congratulations to everyone involved), I'd like to revisit the discussion
from the summer about SCons performance.
This email is a follow up to
http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/2017-July/004371.html
While there
I have talked with the dev that make Conan. They are huge SCons fans. From what
I understand their customers are big on CMake, so they put effort into. I know
I have thought of a similar feature in Parts. Conan seems like it would be a
better option.
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
https://sourceforge.net/p/potm/discussion/vote/thread/22b0f0fd/
(Clunky voting system.. comment on their wiki to vote it seems..)
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev