Yeah, there is to much room for error with floats lining up to the indices
for the desired tests. It should take in the test indices I guess, the only
drawback being you need to know/calculate the indices before hand.
--interval-start INT index in the list of tests to start testing
from
Sounds good. Just need to ensure that splitting in quarters doesn't either
drop one or run one test twice because of rounding..
-Bill
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> What about this:
>
> --interval-start FLOAT Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0)
What about this:
--interval-start FLOAT Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
to start on from the
determined list of all tests
--interval-end FLOAT Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
to start on from the
Maybe add a flag directly to runtest.py to split up the tests.
--test_mod 4 --test_index 0..3 ?
Or something to that affect.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>
> I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out due
>
Hey Andrew,
I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out due
to issues with vswhere:
https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91
In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.
Also just to note; the issue
Parallel should help.
On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded tests)
it takes 2:05.
So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour if
not, try -j3?
Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
-Bill
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54
I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but we're
hitting their 1 hour time limit (see
https://github.com/ajf58/scons/blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ajf58/scons.
My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel (as
the
Bill,
I'm not sure if you were asking Daniel to enable those versions, or simply
if it were possible.
The answer to the latter is yes, easily:
https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/blob/master/.travis.yml
Jonathon Reinhart
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Bill Deegan
Daniel,
Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
-Bill
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan
wrote:
> Thanks!
> That's pretty cool.
> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
> That'll also be very useful..
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM,
Thanks!
That's pretty cool.
I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
That'll also be very useful..
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
jonathon.reinh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>
> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>
Yes, it should automatically do that.
See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the "checks"
that ran.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at
Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the pull request?
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> yes it will do a build for each PR automatically, and if the repo making
> the PR has travis enabled it will also show the build from that repo
yes it will do a build for each PR automatically, and if the repo making
the PR has travis enabled it will also show the build from that repo in the
PR.
You can see it it in one of the PR now and clicking show all checks:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/25
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:02 PM,
Does it build on pull request?
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> also email notification is an option so we could include scons-dev on
> build notifications, but direct email notifications can't filter on branch.
> A web server receiving a webhook
Not needed to have github post to twitter...
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> Writing tweets to twitter will require private API keys, which implies a
> private server is needed.
>
> Is there any private server scons has that could run a small web
also email notification is an option so we could include scons-dev on build
notifications, but direct email notifications can't filter on branch. A web
server receiving a webhook notification could how ever instead send emails
to scons-dev with such a filter.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:47 PM,
The web server could filter what results would actually get posted
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
jonathon.reinh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is @SConsProject the Twitter account you're referring to?
>
> Does SCons really want to post Tweets when a build fails? I've never seen
>
Is @SConsProject the Twitter account you're referring to?
Does SCons really want to post Tweets when a build fails? I've never seen
this before. To me, Twitter is used by open-source projects for things like
announcing new releases, bugfixes, special events, etc. and not posting to
the world when
Writing tweets to twitter will require private API keys, which implies a
private server is needed.
Is there any private server scons has that could run a small web server to
receive the webhook notification from travis and write the tweet to twitter?
For the web server, I was thinking of using a
I'll have to look at appveyor. depends on the available tools.
Certainly the hardware seems faster than what our buildbot workers are
running on..
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Andrew Featherstone <
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
> I've added my Travis-CI status to the README.rst in
I've added my Travis-CI status to the README.rst in
https://github.com/ajf58/scons/commit/b2e381c22539898a06a119ed507a6349ca759d38,
which you may want to take.
>From my perspective I'd like to see
1. Windows based CI on GitHub using https://www.appveyor.com/ (de-facto
Windows CI for GitHub).
2.
Great!
That's all I can think of at the moment.
Thanks,
-Bill
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/notifications/
>
> IRC is covered. Webhook seems open ended to setup for any site so seems
> possible for Twitter messages
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/notifications/
IRC is covered. Webhook seems open ended to setup for any site so seems
possible for Twitter messages with some setup.
Any other notification types we are interested in?
I'll take a look and submit a PR.
On Dec 5, 2017 12:55 PM, "Bill Deegan"
Should be enabled now.
Just merged one of your pull requests..
I'll keep an eye on it.
Can we get the results to post on twitter? and/or IRC?
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Bill Deegan
wrote:
> Yes. I'll get to it in the next week or so.
> We do have buildbot doing
Yes. I'll get to it in the next week or so.
We do have buildbot doing similar at : buildbot.scons.org
-Bill
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> In this pull request:
> https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/17
>
> SCons got a Travis CI script added to the
In this pull request:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/17
SCons got a Travis CI script added to the repo. Travis CI is a free service
for running each new commit to github against a testing script
(.travis.yml). This takes place on Travis's servers and builds are recorded
and accessible via
26 matches
Mail list logo