On 25.09.2012 20:03, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote:
Hi there,
for fixing the current Buildbot failures I still have to fight down several
RPM tests. They check the names of the created RPM files
I think many of the current tests are way too strict
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> for fixing the current Buildbot failures I still have to fight down several
> RPM tests. They check the names of the created RPM files
I think many of the current tests are way too strict in how they test
the build output. They
: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:39 PM
To: SCons developer list
Subject: [Scons-dev] RPM helper functions, where should they go?
Hi there,
for fixing the current Buildbot failures I still have to fight down several RPM
tests. They check the names of the created RPM files, which differ depending on
Hi there,
for fixing the current Buildbot failures I still have to fight down
several RPM tests. They check the names of the created RPM files, which
differ depending on the used hardware/os combination.
I'd like to wrap the original RPM functions for canonicalizing
machine/system names and al
