Re: [Scons-dev] SCons almost at 1M downloads..

2013-03-31 Thread Gary Oberbrunner
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, William Deegan wrote: > Russel, > > In the absence of other interesting numbers, it will suffice for my needs. > Since we don't get a per seat price.. ;) > > And the steady growth in downloads/month is certainly encouraging, no matter what else. -- Gary __

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons almost at 1M downloads..

2013-03-31 Thread William Deegan
Russel, In the absence of other interesting numbers, it will suffice for my needs. Since we don't get a per seat price.. ;) -Bill On Mar 31, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 08:40 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> It will be bigger. ;) > > Also, direct downloads

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons almost at 1M downloads..

2013-03-31 Thread Russel Winder
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 08:40 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > It will be bigger. ;) Also, direct downloads are a poor measure of use. Organizations will generally do one download for all their staff. And then there is Debian/Ubuntu/Mint, Fedora/RHEL, HomeBrew, MacPorts: one download, totally unkn

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons almost at 1M downloads..

2013-03-30 Thread anatoly techtonik
It will be bigger. ;) -- anatoly t. On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Deegan wrote: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/scons/files/stats/timeline?dates=2001-06-28%20to%202013-03-28 > > ___ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > http

[Scons-dev] SCons almost at 1M downloads..

2013-03-28 Thread William Deegan
http://sourceforge.net/projects/scons/files/stats/timeline?dates=2001-06-28%20to%202013-03-28 ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev