William,
thanks for your quick reply.
On 31.05.2014 01:39, William Blevins wrote:
Dirk,
Team,
I have a couple points I'd like to discuss, but for the sake of
organization, I intend to split them into separate emails.
Java Part #2
There has been some discussion on making
Dirk,
thanks for your quick reply.
I really wanted to reply sooner, but I can't get access to private email
during the day except on my phone.
That's good to hear, any helping hand is welcome. I haven't been involved
in the latest Java development, so the link list I gave you in the mailing
Hi William,
please find a few comments below.
On 30.05.2014 02:42, William Blevins wrote:
Team,
I have a couple points I'd like to discuss, but for the sake of
organization, I intend to split them into separate emails.
Java Part #2
There has been some discussion on making Scons more
Dirk,
Team,
I have a couple points I'd like to discuss, but for the sake of
organization, I intend to split them into separate emails.
Java Part #2
There has been some discussion on making Scons more ANT-like,
http://www.scons.org/wiki/JavaSupport, and that might solve some issues
like
Team,
I have a couple points I'd like to discuss, but for the sake of
organization, I intend to split them into separate emails.
Java Part #2
There has been some discussion on making Scons more ANT-like,
http://www.scons.org/wiki/JavaSupport, and that might solve some issues
like identifying
Team,
I have a couple points I'd like to discuss, but for the sake of
organization, I intend to split them into separate emails.
Java Part #1
There has been some discussion on making Scons more ANT-like,
http://www.scons.org/wiki/JavaSupport, and that might solve some issues
like identifying
SCons Team,
I've been using SCons for a couple years now and I have some thoughts about
the Java toolkit.
I know that there has been consideration for revamping the Java toolkit and
I was wondering if anyone would be open to constructive feedback.
Firstly, I'd like to say that SCons is a
