Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 14:09 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: > […] > I would also like to make us a clear statement first, about what we > want to change/migrate and why we want to do it. I'm currently  > trying to find examples of large open-source projects (not some small > repos, maintained by a

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 14:09 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: > > > […] > > I would also like to make us a clear statement first, about what we > > want to change/migrate and why we want to do it. I'm currently > > trying to

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > On 09.01.2016 20:47, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> Dirk, >> >> For me, its "pain in having to remember how to do things in mercurial >> which I only use for scons" each time I go to work on it I >> have to refresh my mental cache.

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

Hi Gary, On 10.01.2016 16:05, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Dirk Bächle > wrote: On 09.01.2016 20:47, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, For me, its "pain in having to remember how to do things in mercurial which

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

On Ned, 2016-01-10 at 10:05 -0500, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > So would switching lead to more commits and bugfixes? I can't say for > sure but from what I've seen in hiring developers, almost everyone > knows git and puts it on their resume, and I only rarely see hg > experience. So it _might_

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

. Jason From: Russel Winder Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 7:49 AM To: dl9...@darc.de; SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 14:09 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: > […] > I would also like to make us a clear statement first,

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 17:54 +0100, Saša Janiška wrote: > […] > Correct - nothing close to BB/GH, only http://chiselapp.com/. > The big up-side of Fossil is that the wiki and issue tracker are part of the repository. The downside is lack of traction in the "market". -- Russel.

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

Hi, On 06.01.2016 22:16, Jason Kenny wrote: I have done the opposite myself ( moved code from guthub to bitbucket) it is very easy either direction. However I have to ask. Is this about moving to Git from HG or to Github? I think these are two different questions. I would also like to make

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

Dirk, For me, its "pain in having to remember how to do things in mercurial which I only use for scons" each time I go to work on it I have to refresh my mental cache. Which I'm pretty sure wouldn't be measurable by such statistics. But (at least for me) would increase the amount of fun it is to

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

It looks right at a glance. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > I wanted to see how hard this would be. > Pretty simple. Github has a migrator which did all the work. > If anyone wants to take a look and see if they find any issues with the >

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

If I look at the branch pchdll in which 2 commits were done, githib doesn't show anything before those commits. This seems wrong. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/commits/branch/pchdll

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

one would want to move github as well. Jason Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:03:05 -0800 From: b...@baddogconsulting.com To: scons-dev@scons.org Subject: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github All, I wanted to see how hard this would be. Pretty simple. Github has a migrator which did all