Is there any way to enumerate all the existing PR/Issues and overwrite only
the issues? (and/or items without corresponding changelists)?
That'd allow us to re-use the existing 3k or so aborted migrated issues.
-Bill
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Featherstone <
Hi All,
I've addressed all the issues that I'm aware of with the importing of
issues into GitHub. I don't kniow if there's anything we can do to fix the
existing changes to the merge requests, but AFAICT we're ready to give this
another go.
Regards,
Andrew
On 3 January 2018 at 18:37, Bill
Crap.
It looks like the migration script overwrote existing pull requests.
They are all gone and replaced with migrated bugs.
Let me see if I can get ahold of github and get them restored..
-Bill
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Bill Deegan
wrote:
> o.k. I'm going to
o.k. I'm going to disable the issues and remove the lock on the scons/scons
repo for now. I'll fork out another for use trying out any fixes before
rolling out to the main repo.
-Bill
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Featherstone <
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Yes
Hi All,
Yes you're right, it seems that "every pull request is an issue, but not
every issue is a pull request." as noted at https://developer.github.com/
v3/issues/#list-issues. I've raised a couple of issues at
https://github.com/SCons/tigris-to-github/issues to submit my fixes
against. I'm not
Yes the 36 Pull Request we had got overwritten with the bug information for
1-36.
If possible i think it would be best to move the pull request to the newest
numbers so all the cross references to issue numbers can stay the same.
Also another issue I saw was that # sign will link to other
Hi Bill,
I'm glad you persevered. No I've not put any effort into making this work
with Python 2. There's some crude retry mechanisms in the implementation.
By the look of https://github.com/scons/scons/issues this is still
trundling on, as the issue count keeps going up when I refresh the
Got past that. Requires python 3 and a few modules.
Running now but just got the folllowing:
GitHub repository for issues: scons/scons
GitHub repository for attachments: scons/tigris-issue-attachments
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
422 {'message': 'Validation Failed', 'errors': [], 'documentation_url': '
Andrew,
Great!
I'll see if I can kick off the migration today and start 2018 on a high
note!
Thanks for all the hard work!
-Bill
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 6:23 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
> Done.
>
> On 29 December 2017 at 17:28, Bill Deegan
Done.
On 29 December 2017 at 17:28, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Can you send a pull request to scons/tigris-to-github ?
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
> andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
>
>> I've just check this morning that it's able to
Can you send a pull request to scons/tigris-to-github ?
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
> I've just check this morning that it's able to work with an organization's
> repos and not just an individual's. If you don't want to solicit
I've just check this morning that it's able to work with an organization's
repos and not just an individual's. If you don't want to solicit feedback
on the users' mailing list, then the next step is to perform the migration.
So, to move things forward:
1. Clone my repo.
2. Call python
Yes. Sorry I didn't see the link in the existing markup.
That looks good to me.
So to move forward (migrate bugs to scons/scons and attachments to
scons/tigris-issue-attachements/ ) what do I need to do?
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Featherstone <
Hi Bill,
I'm not sure I follow you. The issue numbers and the Tigris 'attachment
IDs' (used as the folder names) aren't the same value. Where issues have
attachments they are reffered to in the issue by name, and the URL is
included in the Markdown. As an example, see
Can you add to the github bug a link to the github attachment repo where
appropriate?
(so you don't have to go look for the repo and then the issue number
folder.)
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> I think it's awesome, looks great fully support moving
I think it's awesome, looks great fully support moving forward with this!
Good work!
On Dec 28, 2017 2:36 PM, "Andrew Featherstone" <
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any comments or feedback on this?
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
>
>
> On 17 December 2017 at 18:58, Bill Deegan
Hi All,
Any comments or feedback on this?
Regards,
Andrew
On 17 December 2017 at 18:58, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Great work!
> I'll try and set aside some time to review it this week.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Featherstone <
>
17 matches
Mail list logo