On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Gary Oberbrunner
wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Oberbrunner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
>>> wrote:
>>>
I se
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Jason Kenny wrote:
>
> I would hope that the concepts I talked about here are something we can
> find common ground on and talk about defining some common name for. I know
> this is a large e-mail, However I like very much some thoughts about what I
> suggest at hi
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:57 PM, anatoly techtonik
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Bill Deegan
> wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking that some combination of bugs in the bug tracking system +
>> wiki to capture user stories, etc would be better than an email thread?
>>
>> Here:
>> https://bitbuck
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Bill Deegan
wrote:
> I'm thinking that some combination of bugs in the bug tracking system +
> wiki to capture user stories, etc would be better than an email thread?
>
> Here:
> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/browse/ToolchainRevamp
>
No BB wiki please. I
object
example with both system for use to discuss.
Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Gary Oberbrunner
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:13 PM
To: Jason Kenny
Cc: SCons developer list
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress
You talk a lot about what I consider
I'm thinking that some combination of bugs in the bug tracking system +
wiki to capture user stories, etc would be better than an email thread?
Here:
https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/browse/ToolchainRevamp
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Gary Oberbrunner
wrote:
> You talk a lot about w
Hi there,
just wanted to say that I second Gary in all his points...especially the last
one. ;)
Dirk
Am 21. Oktober 2015 02:59:02 MESZ, schrieb Gary Oberbrunner
:
>Comments inline.
>
>On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
>
>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Ober
You talk a lot about what I consider "policy": specific types of args that
would be used to configure specific types of Tools, like compilers. This is
all fine, but my goal is to build a framework where such policies can be
applied, and then get into the specifics of platforms, cross-compilers,
ver
Comments inline.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Oberbrunner
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I see the implementation, but I don't see any use cases. I know it
>>> sounds t
Hi Gary,
>From looking at the below this seems to be in line with what is going on in
>Parts. I had hoped that what I did here would be used /improved on in Scons.
>That is the a goal of Parts.. to improve Scons.
>From what you talk about below I think we are in general on the same page. I
>k
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Oberbrunner
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I see the implementation, but I don't see any use cases. I know it sounds
>> too formal, but I can't validate the assumptions we had towards the new
>> toolchain withou
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik
wrote:
>
> I see the implementation, but I don't see any use cases. I know it sounds
> too formal, but I can't validate the assumptions we had towards the new
> toolchain without a formal list. Do you have some notes or maybe BDD tests
> for that
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Vasily wrote:
> so I wanted to see if there was something on the SCons side of things I
> can look at for inspiration.
Well, the current message about missing Visual Studio on Windows is a great
source of inspiration to me. =)
--
anatoly t.
__
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Gary Oberbrunner
wrote:
> I'm just starting to get back into it.
> If you'd like to take a look at the current state of things, check out
> h...@bitbucket.org/garyo/scons-newtool and look in
> src/engine/SCons/ToolchainDesign.
> The next thing on my list for it is
; the current design.
>
> Jason
>
> *From:* Gary Oberbrunner
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:14 PM
> *To:* SCons developer list
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress
>
> I'm just starting to get back into it.
> If you'd like t
intent is with the current design.
Jason
From: Gary Oberbrunner
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:14 PM
To: SCons developer list
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress
I'm just starting to get back into it.
If you'd like to take a look at the current state of things,
I'm just starting to get back into it.
If you'd like to take a look at the current state of things, check out
h...@bitbucket.org/garyo/scons-newtool and look in
src/engine/SCons/ToolchainDesign.
The next thing on my list for it is a nice generalized executable-finder
(PATH, registry, env, hard-code
Vasily,
I think Gary was working on that. Work's ongoing.
It's not imminent to be merged into main.
Are you volunteering to help?
;)
-Bill
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Vasily wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I recall there were some plans on refactoring how Tools work in SCons.
> Are there any news o
18 matches
Mail list logo
