Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread John Hallam
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, TC wrote: Actually, I overstate my han'lessness. I know more about this stuff than your average Joe in the street. And the fact that *I* can't do something as simple as this surely proves that Linux is still *miles* away from Windows in usability for the common man.

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread TC
... Linux is still *miles* away from Windows in usability for the common man. *Miles*. True. On Windows, you'd just wipe the disk and do a clean re-install and then it would all work fine... Often true. And the fact that Windows is still more usable, *despite* that problem, merely proves

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread TC
... rpmfind.net has hits for both apt and yum, including the below link for apt Thanks. ... Are you talking miles away when RH9 was new, or still miles away now that it has been superceded by Fedora? The former. I'm going to take a fresh copy of Fedora and see how that performs. I don't

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread iain d broadfoot
* TC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: But it is pish awful - *so* pish awful as to overwhelm those undoubted advantages - when it comes to the average desktop user's needs. ummm. average desktop users need their OS to not crash every day. iain -- If sharing a thing in no

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread TC
ummm. average desktop users need their OS to not crash every day. iain Sheesh, it really is like a religion, isn't it? This sort of statement shows that it's not just The Evil Empire that uses fear, uncertainty and dread. Windows doesn't crash every day. 98, didn't. 2K certainly doesn't.

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread TC
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 00:30, Charles McCrimmon wrote: anyway, i was just mailing to say i think this is nutz havin a public argument/discussion about windows Vs Linux on a Lug mailing list utterly nutz :D a. It stemmed from a discussion about RPMs on Linux b. It's still about Linux (albeit

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread TC
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 00:30, Charles McCrimmon wrote: anyway, i was just mailing to say i think this is nutz havin a public argument/discussion about windows Vs Linux on a Lug mailing list utterly nutz :D a. It stemmed from a discussion about RPMs on Linux b. It's still about Linux (albeit

Re: [Scottish] Failed RPM dependencies - what to do about 'em?

2004-06-16 Thread Charles McCrimmon
Ive been following the thread, i made sure i read it right from the start before replying. i didnt add any fuel, just pointing out it was a useless argument thats probably appeared on this mailing list a few times and never ever ends well, no matter what the original subject was about, and i did