Willie wrote:
[snip]
OK not everyone is near Glasgow and like it or not, whether we call ourselves
the Scottish LUG we are effectively the Glasgow LUG. Although by all accounts
a successful LAN party was held through in the mysterious east at the
weekend.
Is it time perhaps to rename ourselves t
PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [S
On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 14:40, William Anderson wrote:
>
> Is it time perhaps to rename ourselves the Glasgow LUG? Also, the Scottish
> LUG could be reused as an umbrella organisation, perhaps uniting the other
> LUGs in Scotland to form a larger community ... This could be an excellent
> way of g
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 3:58 pm, Ben Thorp wrote:
> Feb - Debate - will Linux be ready for the desktop in 2004
> Tony has advised that he doesn't think that a debate is a good idea, so we
> can change that one.
I don't know about a debate as such, but it would be handy to have a
discussion
Ian Ruffell wrote:
> (e.g. my major concern still is the Access replacement - both Rekall and
> Kexio are getting there, perhaps) but also to do with institutions and
> processes.
Ian,
What's Kexio? I'm guessing it's a tyop since google only returns 9
results, none of which seem relevant or mayb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 19:40, Allan Whiteford wrote:
> Ian Ruffell wrote:
>
>
> > (e.g. my major concern still is the Access replacement - both Rekall and
> > Kexio are getting there, perhaps) but also to do with institutions and
> > processes.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 19:03, Phil Deane wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 14:40, William Anderson wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Is it time perhaps to rename ourselves the Glasgow LUG? Also, the
> > Scottish
LUG could be reused as an umbrella organisation,
First off, apologies Tony, I forgot that when you reply to a post on the list
it goes back to the original poster.
> On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 14:40, William Anderson wrote:
> > Is it time perhaps to rename ourselves the Glasgow LUG? Also, the
> > Scottish LUG could be reused as an umbrella organis
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 9:42 pm, Kyle Gordon wrote:
> I believe he was meaning Kexi, from http://www.koffice.org/kexi/
Yes, ahem, sorry. My bad.
(There's a [non-free] Latin grammar program called Flexio which is on my mind
at the moment for various reasons: one of my copious-free-time proje
ith the mailing list - keep getting funny reply-to addresses?)
No idea :-p
Regards
Kyle
>
> William Anderson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent by:cc:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
