On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:23:31AM +0300, Timo Savola wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 20:25 -0700, Diane Holt wrote:
>
> > Actually, can you just tell me what --sbox-call is for? Looking at the
> > patch for it, it seems to just be skipping it anyway (unless I'm
> > missing something). The comment
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 20:25 -0700, Diane Holt wrote:
> Actually, can you just tell me what --sbox-call is for? Looking at the
> patch for it, it seems to just be skipping it anyway (unless I'm
> missing something). The comment for the commit that added it said
> something about a "calling conventi
Actually, can you just tell me what --sbox-call is for? Looking at the patch
for it, it seems to just be skipping it anyway (unless I'm missing
something). The comment for the commit that added it said something about a
"calling convention", but I'm not sure what that really means.
Thanks,
Diane
No, the modifications to the qemu I have are not available anywhere else. If
it needs to get built with the scratchbox patches applied to it, I can
probably get that done, but I need to know if that's the case, and if so,
whether all the scratchbox patches get applied, up to and including the one
f
Diane Holt wrote:
I noticed that for 0.9.0 in your repository, there's only one patch file
(to the Makefile, to build static), so do you apply all the patches for
the previous versions as well?
Sorry to be a bother, but I really need to get this working (this qemu
supports additional features
Hi Timo & Jussi,
Thanks very much for turning that around so quickly. Unfortunately, my qemu
still isn't working for me -- but I think I may know why now. In looking
through your repository, I found a number of patch files for the qemu
sources. Are the qemu's that are used in scratchbox all built
Timo Savola wrote:
Thanks! I had actually just tracked down misc_runner, so I was starting to
look at misc_runner.c myself, but if the fix will be available soon, I guess
I can stop doing that :)
BTW, I tried passing the flag in using the var, but it didn't work.
It should.. Anyway, my change
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Diane Holt wrote:
> Thanks! I had actually just tracked down misc_runner, so I was starting to
> look at misc_runner.c myself, but if the fix will be available soon, I guess
> I can stop doing that :)
>
> BTW, I tried passing the flag in using the var, bu
Thanks! I had actually just tracked down misc_runner, so I was starting to
look at misc_runner.c myself, but if the fix will be available soon, I guess
I can stop doing that :)
BTW, I tried passing the flag in using the var, but it didn't work.
Diane
On 10/18/07, Timo Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:50:32AM -0700, Diane Holt wrote:
> Actually, it's something I need right away. I'd be fine with trying to
> implement it myself, but I don't really know what would need changing. If
> you could point me in the right direction, that'd be fine.
I'm acutally working on it
Actually, it's something I need right away. I'd be fine with trying to
implement it myself, but I don't really know what would need changing. If
you could point me in the right direction, that'd be fine. Or, could you
tell me how to (from your bug report) "pass in one extra argument by abusing
the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:47:26PM -0700, Diane Holt wrote:
> Is there any way to pass flags to qemu (when it's run automatically by way
> of executing an arm executable)? I didn't see anything in the
> variables.txtfile (like the *EXTRA_ARGS* type vars for the compiler,
> etc.).
http://bugzilla.
Hi,
Is there any way to pass flags to qemu (when it's run automatically by way
of executing an arm executable)? I didn't see anything in the
variables.txtfile (like the *EXTRA_ARGS* type vars for the compiler,
etc.).
Thanks,
Diane
___
Scratchbox-users m
13 matches
Mail list logo
