[ date ] 2004/08/13 | Friday | 08:19 AM
[ author ] John Beppu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was just saying that I, as a private individual who uses
> SDL_Perl, found your patches useful. I don't have any
> authority or maintainership over the SDL_Perl code.
But damn... how many forks of SDL_Perl d
[ date ] 2004/08/13 | Friday | 02:37 AM
[ author ] Andy Bakun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I appreciate the patches you're putting up, and
> > I am applying them.
>
> John, sorry to be obtuse, but where are you applying them? Do you have
> access to some (relatively authoritative for SDL_Perl) sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Thursday 12 August 2004 17:25, John Beppu wrote:
>
> are these making it to the list??? reply if you see this.
>
Dunt see nuthin', sarge...
Cheers,
Tels
- --
Signed on Fri Aug 13 09:39:17 2004 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 13:11, John Beppu wrote:
> While experimenting with SDL::App the other day, I noticed that
> the constructor returns a blessed scalar.
>
> Questions:
>
> - What does the dereferenced scalar contain?
It seems to me that all the objects that the SDL Perl modules ret
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:44, John Beppu wrote:
> [ date ] 2004/07/30 | Friday | 09:16 PM
> [ author ] Andy Bakun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > SDL::Surface::blit always dies if you pass 0 (allowed according to the
> > docs) for drect. This is due to a typo when checking the parentage of
> > the pa
are these making it to the list??? reply if you see this.
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:44, John Beppu wrote:
> Wouldn't that be nice. If there's gonna be a release,
> I'd like to see SDL_PushEvent() and SDL_PeekEvent() be supported.
> I think they're missing from Dave's 2.1.0 release.
I submitted a patch a while ago (maybe four months?) that implemented
