在 2012-12-18二的 13:41 +0100,Vasilis Liaskovitis写道:
> This patch adds a 'SIZE' type property to qdev.
>
> It will make dimm description more convenient by allowing sizes to be
> specified
> with K,M,G,T prefixes instead of number of bytes e.g.:
> -device dimm,id=mem0,size=2G,bus=membus.0
>
> Credi
在 2013-01-09三的 01:08 +0100,Andreas Färber写道:
> Am 18.12.2012 13:41, schrieb Vasilis Liaskovitis:
> > Because dimm layout needs to be configured on machine-boot, all dimm devices
> > need to be specified on startup command line (either with populated=on or
> > with
> > populated=off). The dimm info
Hi,
> Turns out it's this:
>
> commit 76e58028d28e78431f9de3cee0b3c88d807fa39d
> Author: Kevin O'Connor
> Date: Wed Mar 6 21:50:09 2013 -0500
>
> acpi: Eliminate BDAT parameter passing to DSDT code.
>
> The "BDAT" construct is the only ACPI mechanism that relies on SeaBIOS
>
Am Dienstag, den 19.03.2013, 22:18 -0400 schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:59:53AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 19.03.2013, 19:05 -0400 schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
> > > Basically everything under the "BIOS interfaces" menu is low-level and
> > > should not be chang
Paul Menzel wrote:
> it would be nice if it is clear for noobs like me, what certain
> option do and what effects they have.
The good way to fix that is for you to send patches for the Kconfig
help messages. *After* you have researched what the options do.
//Peter
pgptDFHdnLwQL.pgp
Description
On 03/20/2013 12:06 AM, li guang wrote:
>> +return snprintf(dest, len, "%0.03f%c", (double)*ptr/div, suffixes[i]);
> ^^ ^^^
>> +}
>> +
>
> IMHO, you may need (double)(*ptr/div), for type cast is right
> associated.
No, the code as wri
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
tables to qemu, we need to make sure the code we'll be m
On 03/20/13 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> If you allow the use of your contribution in QEMU under the
> terms of GPLv2 or later as proposed by this patch,
> please respond to this mail including the line:
>
> Acked-by: Name
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann
cheers,
Gerd
_
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 08:17 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Turns out it's this:
> >
> > commit 76e58028d28e78431f9de3cee0b3c88d807fa39d
> > Author: Kevin O'Connor
> > Date: Wed Mar 6 21:50:09 2013 -0500
> >
> > acpi: Eliminate BDAT parameter passing to DSDT code.
> >
> >
On 2013-03-20 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the p
Hi,
>> With qemu/master you can just use 'qemu -L /path/to/seabios/out' instead
>> and qemu will pick up both bios.bin and dsdt from the fresh seabios
>> build directory then (and anything else it doesn't find there from the
>> default locations).
>
> Thanks, yes that's it. QEMU only seems to
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:46 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> With qemu/master you can just use 'qemu -L /path/to/seabios/out' instead
> >> and qemu will pick up both bios.bin and dsdt from the fresh seabios
> >> build directory then (and anything else it doesn't find there from the
> >>
As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support, we won't always
find the VGA device on the root bus. We therefore need to add support
to find and enable a VGA device and the path to it through the VGA
Enable support in the PCI bridge control register.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson
---
v3:
Dear Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 10:58 -0600 schrieb Alex Williamson:
> As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support,
could you give a commit or version for QEMU please.
> we won't always find the VGA device on the root bus. We therefore
> need to add support to find and enable a
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 19:05 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Alex,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 10:58 -0600 schrieb Alex Williamson:
> > As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support,
>
> could you give a commit or version for QEMU please.
This would be targeted towards QEMU 1.5. M
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the p
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek
---
src/acpi.c | 19 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c
index 8bbc92b..611553e 100644
--- a/src/acpi.c
+++ b/src/acpi.c
@@ -797,13 +797,13 @@ acpi_setup(void)
struct fadt_descriptor_rev1 *
These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
consistency with other field settings in this function.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek
---
src/acpi.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c
index 119d1c1..8bbc
The first patch cleans up some field assignments in build_madt(). The
second one handles the case when MADT is provided by qemu over fw_cfg.
I'll soon post the qemu-side series as well.
I cross-tested {patched, unpatched} qemu with {patched, unpatched}
seabios. Inside a RHEL-6 guest I dumped the
Il 20/03/2013 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving
On 03/20/2013 11:57 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving ac
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
Not entirely sure I actually touched anything you'll be copyi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the p
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:04PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
> consistency with other field settings in this function.
Thanks. We can do this to improve documentation. Please ack that you
are okay with licensing under GPLv2
On 03/20/13 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
>
On 03/21/13 00:52, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:04PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
>> consistency with other field settings in this function.
>
> Thanks. We can do this to improve documentation. Please
On 03/20/13 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:05PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek
I think we need to figure out what the final fw_cfg interface for
ACPI, SMBIOS, mptable, and PIR will be.
We can use the current fw_cfg ACPI table passing mechanism for ACPI,
but there are a couple of
在 2013-03-20三的 08:24 -0600,Eric Blake写道:
> On 03/20/2013 12:06 AM, li guang wrote:
>
> >> +return snprintf(dest, len, "%0.03f%c", (double)*ptr/div, suffixes[i]);
> > ^^ ^^^
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > IMHO, you may need (double)(*ptr/div),
Acked-by: Kenji Kaneshige
Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:58 AM
> To: seabios@seabios.org
> Cc: David Woodhouse; Eduardo Habkost; Gerd Hoffmann; Gleb Natapov; Isaku
> Yamahata; Jan Kis
Acked-by: Isaku Yamahata
thanks,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
> of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
> when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
>
> QEMU is GPLv2
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:22:30PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:05PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek
>
> I think we need to figure out what the final fw_cfg interface for
> ACPI, SMBIOS, mptable, and PIR will be.
>
> We can use the
On 03/20/13 17:58, Alex Williamson wrote:
> As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support, we won't always
> find the VGA device on the root bus. We therefore need to add support
> to find and enable a VGA device and the path to it through the VGA
> Enable support in the PCI bridge control r
34 matches
Mail list logo