On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:19:31PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:32:55 +
> "Sironi, Filippo" wrote:
> > So, my understanding is that even QEMU needs to be fixed and I can
> > work to provide a patch. However, as I was mentioning before, I'm
> > also interesting in updat
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:32:55 +
"Sironi, Filippo" wrote:
> > On 30 Jan 2017, at 04:39, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:57:19 +0100
> > Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Siron
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 04:39, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:57:19 +0100
> Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPU
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:38:04PM +, Sironi, Filippo wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 2017, at 06:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
> >> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
> >> numbered starting from 0 and the
> On 27 Jan 2017, at 06:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
>> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
>> numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical
>> CPU on each core while the
On 01/30/17 13:39, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:57:19 +0100
> Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
num
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:57:19 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
> >> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
> >> numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers
On 01/27/17 15:57, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
>>> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
>>> numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical
On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
>> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
>> numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical
>> CPU on each core while the second half r
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
> When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
> numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical
> CPU on each core while the second half refers to the second logical CPU
> on each core
When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are
numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical
CPU on each core while the second half refers to the second logical CPU
on each core.
As an example, on machine with 2 sockets, 4 cores per socket, and 2
lo
11 matches
Mail list logo