y want to check
> some of the groups there and post a question or two.
> I haven't worked
> with URLScan to the depth of knowing this one off
> the top of my head,
> but if I recall correctly, it *can* be done.
>
> Charlie
>
> dumbwabbit wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I woul
MS actually recommends moving a number of system files
(eg., cmd.exe ftp.exe netstat.exe and others) OUT of
\winnt and \winnt\system32, putting them in a folder
on a separate partition, and setting strict ACLs on
that directory to ONLY allow full control to System
and Administrators.
If you follow
Heh, the fact that Microsoft even has to release
patches, whereas the security vulnerabilities related
to Netscape come every 6 months to a year? Which
seems to be a more stable, secure application in this
light?
Makes Netscape my favorite.
4.79 baby. 6 is OK, nice email features, no Microsof
Hmm, I would NOT recommend opening up the .exe
extension.
Rather, you may want to consider redirecting them to
an FTP site, either your own, or the Citrix download
location (if there is one, sorry I don't know, never
used this client).
Baad security risk to allow .exe
just my
.02
--- "Bo
Hmm, I believe that almost WITHOUT EXCEPTION, ALL
EULA's from any company I have ever done business with
disclaimed liability on behalf of that company should
their product not work in some way.
Basically, the way I interpret it, whether it's
Microsoft OS EULA, GNU, or homegrown, NO company is
re
I also like the GB-100 and GB-1000 by GnatBox, nice
hardware device with great features, good price, very
reliable.
I have used both over the past year.
--- Brad Bendily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3Com has some hardware Firewall products that are
> meant to be used
> in a small office enviro
--- MadHat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 05:06 PM 1/7/2002 -0800, e-CraftZone wrote:
> >Angry IP Scanner 1.87 from Angryziber is good.
> It's very fast. Also
> >includes command line usage.
> >http://www.angryziber.com/ipscan/
>
> Appears to have a problem with WinXP so it does not
> fit the
Hi all.
I'm trying to become more involved with infosec as it
pertains to independent consulting, network auditing,
security advisor status etc. I have worked as CSO/MIS
for a mid-sized firm for the last 2 years, and a small
company for 3 years before that.
My current job function at my full-tim
Network Associates' GroupShield has the same
functionality of being able to automatically
block/delete/quarantine any specified attachment
types.
--- Marco Bicca ® <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 16:25 12-06-2001, Brent Scott wrote:
> Yep, for sure, you should use NAV For Exchange 2.51
> ;-) ... P
See inline comment.
--- "Jay D. Dyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On 6 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Could you please tell me what one can do to
> counter these spammers...
> > My email address has been hidden under the BCC:
> tag and the unsu
Use MD5sum to compare your source file to system file.
Get HandleEx (don't remember from where, sorry), Fport
(maps running processes to ports - from Foundstone),
and some of the utilities from SysInternals -
ListDLLs, Process Explorer, TokenMon, WinObj - between
these, you should be able to dete
Outlook 2000 SP2 (or SP1 with Email Attachment
Security Update), Outlook 2002 both have this
capability. I have never implemented it, nor read too
much about it, so I can't give too many specifics. But
the info is available on Microsoft's site.
With these clients and Exchange 5.5 or 2000, you can
What type of Email server?
If it is Exchange, you need to disallow unauthorized
SMTP relaying. Also, you should enable logging on SMTP
interface in Exchange. See following link:
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm
If you are not using Exchange, we need to know which
email server you are using
Couple of thoughts off the top of my head:
1) The router itself may have vulnerabilities - see
the relatively recent incidents with the Alcatel
routers, and the 3Com DSL routers, an older one with
Zyxel Prestige routers, the @Home cable modem
enumerations
2) What about if you get hit with a tr
I am partial towards Ethereal (the Beta version looks
really nice), and Analyzer (Netgroup Politecnico).
--- BurntCircuit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> im looking for a good windows NT/2K/maybe XP pro)
> packet sniffer to monitor
> the comming and goings of a few programs that i dont
> trust. woul
I had the same problem with Nero. I generally use my
workstation as a Power User or User, and only log in
as Administrator when I need to install drivers etc.
Nero gave me the same problem you describe, I wrote to
them twice and never heard back.
I was finally able to get Nero to work by changin
lc isn't free.
but it DOES work very well...
i insisted that we purchase it for my it dept. - we
use it on a monthly basis.
--- Robert Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lophtcrack
>
> Robert Clark
> MCSE, MCP+I, MCP, A+
> MIS - Texas Cellular
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Palo
17 matches
Mail list logo
