From: "David Gillett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Microsoft's Proxy Server, for instance, required not just NT 4.0 but
also *IIS* to be installed first so it could re-use components from
that; I'm not sure that their ISA product doesn't have similar
requirements.)
It doesn't, I have an ISA box here and IIS
rom: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hardware vs Software Firewall/Router
Date: 2 Apr 2003 03:11:54 -
I work for a consulting company that services businesses with 30 to 200
clients. Our IT Manager likes to use a Linksys, or a 3Com hardware
firewall solution. He is also think
cally
Live tribally
Love God
- Original Message -
From: "James Lee Gromoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software Firewall/Router
>
> My $.02,
>
>
&g
The main reason i can see to prefer a hardware firewall is that since a
software firewall will be installed on a windows system it will be
inevitably depending upon that system's capabilities and vurnable due to
that system's weaknesses...
What i mean is there's always a chance that a new bug fo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: April 1, 2003 19:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Hardware vs Software Firewall/Router
>
> I work for a consulting company that services businesses with
> 30 to 200 clients. Our I
is becoming Cisco.
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hardware vs Software Firewall/Router
Date: 2 Apr 2003 03:11:54 -
I work for a consulting company that services businesses with 30 to 200
clients. Our IT Manager likes to use a Linksys, or a 3Com hardware
firewall
I work for a consulting company that services businesses with 30 to 200
clients. Our IT Manager likes to use a Linksys, or a 3Com hardware
firewall solution. He is also thinking of introducing the Symantec Raptor
(I could be incorrect on the name) software solution. We are mostly a
windows ba
