Re: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-10-15 Thread Frederick Garbrecht
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Schuler, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:34 AM Subject: RE: Network Address Translation insecurities > I'll answer this by posting a snippet from a post Anders Pettersson made to

Re: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-10-02 Thread Johan De Meersman
e we're closing in on the season, I'll put up my christmas tree as your recommend :) > > > >> From: Johan De Meersman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Network Address Translation insecurities >> Date

Re: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-10-01 Thread Chris Berry
obsoleted ages ago >? Most current routers should just ignore any source-routed packages. >Moreover, source routing would require the attacker to have an intimate >knowledge of the NATted network topology. > >> >> >>>From: "Schuler, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread Graham, Randy (RAW)
he network. Randy Graham -Original Message- From: Schuler, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Address Translation insecurities I am looking for information regarding the insecurities and vulnerabilities that exist

RE: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread David
ROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Address Translation insecurities I am looking for information regarding the insecurities and vulnerabilities that exist in Network Address Translation. One of our admins feels that because everything is N

RE: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread Schuler, Jeff
-Original Message- From: Kline, Nathan C - CICT-2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:47 PM To: 'Schuler, Jeff'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Address Translation insecurities How about the fact that an attack can come from inside your firewall? You

RE: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread Kline, Nathan C - CICT-2
, however, NAT is not longer a good protective device. --Nathan -Original Message- From: Schuler, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Address Translation insecurities I am looking for information regarding the

RE: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread Wolf, Glenn
and Cisco routers: http://www.sans.org/y2k/egress.htm Hope this helps, Glenn -Original Message- From: Schuler, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Address Translation insecurities I am looking for i

Re: Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-26 Thread Chris Berry
ld do, perhaps someone else could chime in with a comment on that? >From: "Schuler, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Network Address Translation insecurities >Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:17:04 -0700 > >I am looking for information regardi

Network Address Translation insecurities

2002-09-25 Thread Schuler, Jeff
I am looking for information regarding the insecurities and vulnerabilities that exist in Network Address Translation. One of our admins feels that because everything is NAT'd that there is no way anyone can break into the systems that are NAT'd. I know that this is not a completely accurate sta