In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I believe the US will allow 128 bit encryption to be
exported,
except to a specific list of countries, i.e. Iraq,
Iran, etc. I
unfortunately don't know where I heard/read that
information or where it
can be verified. Perhaps the DOJ website?
Jonathan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:51 PM
To: phil baskers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
Morning,
I am with you Phil in the fact that I could be wrong as well. However,
if memory serves correctly, they have relaxed the export laws a little
bit. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Alexandre Steinberg/RSDB)
Subject:RE: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
Morning,
I am with you Phil in the fact that I could be wrong as well. However,
if memory serves correctly, they have relaxed the export laws a little
bit. I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:51 PM
To: phil baskers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
Morning,
I am with you Phil in the fact that I could be wrong as well. However,
if memory serves correctly, they have relaxed the export laws a little
bit. I
unfortunately don't know where I heard/read that information or where it
can be verified. Perhaps the DOJ website?
Jonathan Grotegut
-Original Message-
From: phil baskers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
, June 21, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: RE: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
Hello Stephen,
40 Bit encryption has been broken, however it is unlikely that the average
hacker has the capabilities to decrypt 40 bit traffic. If your data is not
highly sensitive, then 40 bit encryption may suffice.
Encryption
LOL ... look at sshd for windows ...
40 bit is crackable and 128 will be difficult. What is the information that
this server will be guarding. The more sensitive, the better the encryption
should be. If the information has a real short ttl, then 40 bits should
suffice.
Usually crackers get
Hi Stephen,
You might want to look at purchasing your SSL certificate from another
reseller. An SSL cert should be able to be used at any possible bit
encryption. If you are going to be processing card details or sensitive user
data then I would recommend the highest encryption level available,
Well, it depends which algorithm is used for the encryption. The 'bit' value isn't as
important as you might think, compared to the specific algorithm used.
If you're refering to RSA public key encryption, most online businesses use a 1024 bit
key; 128 bit keys not very secure, given the speed
It all depends on how important you feel the username and password are;)
Every encryption can be cracked, it's just a matter of time. I'd say use
128-bit not only b/c it's stronger, but in my experiences I'd rather spend a
little bit more money on hardware that'll do 128-bit w/o any notice of lag
Hello Stephen,
40 Bit encryption has been broken, however it is unlikely that the average
hacker has the capabilities to decrypt 40 bit traffic. If your data is not
highly sensitive, then 40 bit encryption may suffice.
Encryption alone will not protect you however, if you are sending
11 matches
Mail list logo
