What ever you do, DO NOT HACK your own system, without 
proper authorization.  You can be and will be legally 
responsible for this action.  It's just like any other 
HACKER attacking your network.  You can be fired, fined and 
sent to jail.  Bad move.

I would suggest that you talk to your CEO and get his 
authorization prior to HACKING into your network. 


____________________________________________________________


Hi there,
well, You are being a bit paranoid and it's a good practice 
for
security pros...
I suggest you try and convince your CEO (Directly- as it's 
HIS ass on
the line here
in case your next cracker is less mercifull) to sit and 
listen to a
nice lecture (presentation)
where you, as his security manager, explain exactly how you 
break
into his own Inbox/desktop/whatever
you should bring evidence!!!!!!! strong ones!!!!!!!!
If you decided to resign, that's O.K, but I think a little 
tactics
can get you further
in your career, and your CIO a little backwards.
Rmmember-Hack the Systems and bring Evidence!!!!

Gaziel Avishay,
Information Risk Management
KPMG Somekh-Chaikin
Tel-972-3-6848606/591


- -----Original Message-----
 From: A Question [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ?? 01 ????? 2002 22:38?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is it bad enough to resign?


Greetings,

Beg your parden for sending, but I could use your
advice.

I have been reading this list for some time and have
benefited from it.  There are some good minds on this
list, and a lot of experience, so I submit my question
to you seeking your perspective.

Before I begin, I want to tell you that I have already
made up my mind weather to resign or not, what I am
needing is perspective as the company I work for is
the only one I have worked at as a Systems
Administrator, and the only one that I have been
responsible for securing the system.

The security for the network and servers I administer
is NON-EXISTENT.  This is not only fine with my
superiors, but I have been told to not work on
security anymore, as it is "un-important".  The CEO
thinks that it is secure because my CIO lies and tells
him that it is.

Here is some background.  We have approx. 14,000 IP's
in a stub network (only one way in or out on the
router).  Since those IP's are mostly used to host
virtual hosts, there is over 100,000 total paying
customers that depend on our systems being secure.

We tell customers and the CEO that we have a firewall
- - it's a lie.

* WE HAVE NO FIREWALL ON OUR ENTIRE NETWORK.
* WE HAVE NO INTRUSION DETECTION ON OUR SYSTEM

We use Linux and Windows.  Windows is even more
pathetic as we depend on hotfixes and Service Packs as
our ONLY form of Windows security.  They won't let me
put Snort on it, and they won't buy Black Ice, or
anything else.

To top this off, the CIO refused to let me apply
Service Pack 2 to Windows for months after the
release.  I brought it up every week at our management
meeting.  Finally, several Windows machines were
compromised so that the cracker had admin level access
for weeks before it was even detected.  This would
have been prevented if they would have only let me
apply SP2!   The CIO kept saying that he could hear me
saying "I told you so".  The CIO lied to the CEO and
said that it was not a Admin level intrusion, but
merely a rouge FTP account used for Warez.  The
cracker could have formatted the drives with data at
any time!

It gets even worse than this, but you get the idea.  I
prevented Nimda and Code Red attacks even while
everyone else was wondering what they are.

Do they promote me?  Reward me?  No.  Apparently, they
are too embarrassed as my CIO and Managers that they
are incompetent in security (they setup up the systems
this way, after all), and seeking to keep me quiet,
they demoted me so that I wouldn't be responsible for
security anymore.  As far as I can tell, the only
reason I was promoted to Security Manager was so that
they could have a fall-guy when things went wrong "How
did they do that?  Weren't you doing your job?".  But
when their scheme backfired and I actually did such a
good job that their position in front of the CEO was
threatened, they decided to keep me quiet.

Am I being paranoid?  Am I overacting?  Your
perspective from your experience would be greatly
appreciated.  Also, after I leave, should I send a
letter to the CEO about this?


Thanks


Reply via email to