Hi carlos!
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Mr.Walls ... Well... Qmail is very reliable MTA, however
> it lacks on facilities such virtual domains. It stopped in
Do you mean /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains ?
Inter7 (www.inter7.com) has vpopmail which does virtual domains usi
I have to second this statement. I have used various versions of smail and
sendmail in the past, for some very large volume sites, but neither package
comes close to qmail for over-all speed, ease of use and security. While the
original poster points out the annoyances of Maildir, from an OS pe
Dear Mr.Walls ... Well... Qmail is very reliable MTA, however
it lacks on facilities such virtual domains. It stopped in
time. Second off, the source code is half open and *was*
maintained solely by a single man.
On the other hand it emerged a Patch Campaign to Qmail which
the newest facilities we
I've been using qmail in various situations for quite some time now and,
though I am definitely no serious security expert, I've never had any
problems with it. I've use standalone installations, as well as qmail
with all of the goodies (vpopmail, ezmlm, webmail, qmailadmin, sslwrap,
etc, etc) in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Overall, it is the only mail server I use and I am pretty happy with, no
problems... There are a lot of people that don't like it for various
reasons but I can't complain...
Shawn
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Billy D Walls wrote:
> I recently moved from se
