RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-02-05 Thread Fitzgerald, John
to install ACL to prevent the router itself being attacked. John -Original Message- From: Rich MacVarish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2003 13:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls Greetings, RFC 1918 specifies the reserved private use networks

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-02-01 Thread Radu Paunescu
Of course it's better to have two layers of protection, even though the first one is just a filtering router. The ISP's technical guys are just lazy and they try to bullshit you. All they want to do is to ease their life, having a non standard configuration will require more administrative effort

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread David Gillett
Certainly a firewall can check for things that a router probably doesn't have the memory and/or spare horsepower for. But there is some traffic that is just simply obviously wrong, and the further out from your core you can discard it, the less impact it can have on your network and systems.

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread Garbrecht, Frederick
Your ISP is being dorkish in its approach. There is no question whatsoever that packet filtering at the level of the border router should be an adjunct to stateful inspection at the firewall level. At the very least, router ACLs take some of the burden off of the firewall, and will complement

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread Paul Stewart
In my opinion.. This is a great question..:) The more the better is always the thought however when I configure such scenarios I prefer to have there firewall do the blocking and leave the router to do just routing (which it's best at anyways IMHO) This way you have one place to gather

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread Gene LeDuc
Hi Geoff, It's your ISP not wanting the extra pain of a non-standard installation. Having the router block incoming packets from your address block and those addressed to your broadcast address means your firewall can spend its CPU time dealing with trickier rules. If your company doesn't do

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread Trevor Cushen
You are right on all accounts and fair play to you for battling with them. Yes they are more lazy then anything else and a preset configuration naturally makes their life easier but that is not what you are paying them for. Might I also suggest that you get a copy of the flash memory with the

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

2003-01-31 Thread Trevor Cushen
2983000 Fax: +353 1 2960499 -Original Message- From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2003 17:17 To: 'Geoff Shatz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls In my opinion.. This is a great question..:) The more the better is always