That is management-agent-file-read,
you can have a look at
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-1999-0771
--
ÎÒÒª¸üºÃµÄÉú»î
Yiming Gong
Senior System Administrator
China Telcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://security.zz.ha.cn
0086-0371-7934907
-Original Message-
http://www.google.com/search?q=compaq+insight+directory+traversal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Snort Question
I have been getting this alert, but I can't find out
this is system dependent. i don't believe snort will see the
traffic on a linux box, but it will on an openBSD box. i think
this is a result of where the promisicous device is located
in the kernel structures. on linux, it is obviously after the firewall
code, on openBSD it appears to be
From: Michael Kjorling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:06 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I belive not. The firewall code (the rules of which are managed
through ipfwadm/ipchains/iptables depending on your kernel version) is
executing directly in
from the test i ran, yes it does... however, i think it depends on which machine snort
is running and which machine the firewall software is running on.
my slack box is set up to masquerade my LAN as a firewall/gateway using netfilter. i
installed snort on this same machine for the test. i
that the person kindly provided you with (he kind of did your homework
for you) mail me off list and I will reprovide it for you.
Cheers,
Leon
-Original Message-
From: Claudiu Ionescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Security Basics
Subject: Re: Snort
