re: Windows 2000 Server Attacks

2003-02-22 Thread H C
Paul, > The filename of the software that is responsible we > believe to be msudb32.exe how did you come to this conclusion? Did you run fport to determine that this is the file/process using port 24? What other services do you have running? HTTP? FTP? How about your EventLogs? Do they sh

RE: Windows 2000 Server Attacks

2003-02-22 Thread Mark Stunnenberg
What I know about this, is that 'they' use a bug in IIS to get access on the server. Most of the time they will install a serv-u ftp server. And make hidden dirs that cannot be accessed directly by browsing through the directories (dirs like "com1", "lpt1" a.o.) The file msudb32.exe doesn't ring

Re: Windows 2000 Server Attacks

2003-02-22 Thread Su Wadlow
--On Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:57 PM -0500 Paul Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have no idea how this person has managed to gain some form of access to these servers and are obviously quite concerned. What services are the servers running? Are the machines *fully* patched? We've had s