Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy

2012-09-19 Thread Brad Wetmore
> But I think someone from the security team should chime in on this. I plan to look closer at this. On the surface, it looks acceptable to me, but I've been heads down in the SNI code: likely for one more day. Wanted to also run this by one of my other colleagues. One thought: I'm wonderin

Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy

2012-09-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
It seems fine with me. But I think someone from the security team should chime in on this. -kto On Sep 18, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > This is an issue that has been with us for a while. See: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100062 > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabas

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7199500: Minor typo in AbstractStringBuilder.java header

2012-09-19 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 27182d84a244 Author:chegar Date: 2012-09-19 14:55 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/27182d84a244 7199500: Minor typo in AbstractStringBuilder.java header Reviewed-by: coffeys ! src/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 4722265: (spec str) StringBuffer.ensureCapacity() should mention that capacity is mutable

2012-09-19 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 5d064862376d Author:jgish Date: 2012-09-19 08:52 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5d064862376d 4722265: (spec str) StringBuffer.ensureCapacity() should mention that capacity is mutable Summary: add usage note to AbstractStringBuilder ensureCapacity()