Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 7/30/2014 10:56 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> It seems jtharness just doesn't support one test on two lines. Please review
> the same webrev at
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8052999/webrev.00/
>
> Thanks
> Max
>
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 23:29, Wang Weijun wrot
It seems jtharness just doesn't support one test on two lines. Please review
the same webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8052999/webrev.00/
Thanks
Max
On Jul 29, 2014, at 23:29, Wang Weijun wrote:
> I decide to further investigate why the 2-line version does not work. Webrev
> w
Added security-dev.
With best regards. Petr.
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Florian Bruckner (3kraft)
> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> any feedback on this?
>
> What is the process to have a patch like this accepted?
>
> regards,
>
> Florian
>
> On 15.07.14 10:56, Florian Bruckner (3kraft) wro
I decide to further investigate why the 2-line version does not work. Webrev
withdrawn.
--Max
On Jul 29, 2014, at 23:13, Wang Weijun wrote:
> Please review the problem list change at
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8052999/webrev.00/
>
> Looks like the same test on two lines with di
Please review the problem list change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8052999/webrev.00/
Looks like the same test on two lines with different platform labels does not
work. Now combined.
Should this be a noreg-cleanup?
--Max
Please review this simple fix to eliminate an intermittent test failure.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051972
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8051972/webrev.00/
The fix detects if a self-signed cert has inadvertently been selected for an
invalid-signature test and ign
I guess we can cache the result and remove invalid ones, and probably requery
when all are removed.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8052412 filed.
You said you are having double numbers of KDCs now, so I guess the DNS response
could also double. How come the time spent change from "mer
> I understand your problem. Will see what we can do. When you say "Wouldn't it
> be possible to perform the lookup *once* and then issue all KDC request to
> the KDC whis is working?" do you mean the DNS query result could contain KDCs
> which do not work? Is this common?
It can contain inval
On 07/28/2014 10:57 AM, FELIX YANG wrote:
JDK Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043836
This bug does not seem to be publicly accessible.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
