Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 8/16/2014 2:52 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 10:49 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> I meant to pointed out the modification permissions as well. As update
>> to the returned value needs the related permissions as the following
>> line talked about:
>>
>> 14
On 08/14/2014 10:49 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
I meant to pointed out the modification permissions as well. As update
to the returned value needs the related permissions as the following
line talked about:
149 * To modify the Principals Set, the caller must have
150 * {@code AuthPermi
Could anyone help me as sponsor, please?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
otavioj...@java.net> wrote:
> Thank you Roger.
> Done
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/string_builder_concat_6.zip
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:15 AM, roger riggs