Looks fine.
Thanks
Max
On 5/5/2015 8:49 AM, Jason Uh wrote:
Please review this fix, which enables parsing of X400Address-type
Subject Alternative Names.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8058543/00/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058543
Jason
Please review this fix, which enables parsing of X400Address-type
Subject Alternative Names.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8058543/00/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058543
Jason
On 05/04/2015 10:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/05/2015 13:48, Sean Mullan wrote:
Please review this change to use the system class loader to locate a
policy provider specified with the policy.provider security property.
The current implementation tries to load the provider using the
extension
On 05/04/2015 01:15 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 05/04/2015 05:31 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
CustomPolicy.implies
50 if (pd == policyPd) {
51 return true;
52 }
This is okay for the test. Just for my understanding, for real world
custom policy, should it check
On 05/04/2015 05:31 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
CustomPolicy.implies
50 if (pd == policyPd) {
51 return true;
52 }
This is okay for the test. Just for my understanding, for real world
custom policy, should it check the code source in case the sensitive
opera
On 01/05/2015 13:48, Sean Mullan wrote:
Please review this change to use the system class loader to locate a
policy provider specified with the policy.provider security property.
The current implementation tries to load the provider using the
extension class loader. This will no longer work whe
On 05/01/2015 12:33 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 05/01/2015 05:48 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Please review this change to use the system class loader to locate a
policy provider specified with the policy.provider security property.
The current implementation tries to load the provider using the
exten
1662 for (int i = 0; i < chainLen; i++) {
On 5/4/2015 6:08 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
Which line?
On 2 May 2015, at 02:22, Weijun Wang wrote:
Is it safe to just run for-each on certs (if it's not null)?
--Max
On 5/2/2015 6:39 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
Please review this fix to cor
Which line?
> On 2 May 2015, at 02:22, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Is it safe to just run for-each on certs (if it's not null)?
>
> --Max
>
> On 5/2/2015 6:39 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>> Please review this fix to correct the PKCS12 encoding when a secret key is
>> being stored in one keystore entry
Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 5/4/2015 5:21 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Ping again.
>
> On 4/24/2015 11:29 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Please review a fix at
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8078495/webrev.00
>>
>> which is essentially
>>
>> GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
Ping again.
On 4/24/2015 11:29 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
Please review a fix at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8078495/webrev.00
which is essentially
GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(&Now);
EndTime.dwLowDateTime = msticket->EndTime.LowPart;
EndTim
Artem
If a string starts with whitespace(s), the first element of
split("\\s+") will be an empty string. If you can be sure JAVA_OPTS does
not have them, your code change is fine.
Thanks
Max
On 4/29/2015 11:44 PM, Artem Smotrakov wrote:
Hi Max,
These fancy things sometimes make me forget a
12 matches
Mail list logo
