Please find comments in line.
On 5/27/2015 4:40 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On May 27, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Hi, Mandy,
I have second thought on using the provider name for the java.security file...
There are a few things that I want to discuss/brainstorm internally to make sure t
On 5/29/2015 4:17 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 12:41 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8043758/webrev.latest/
>>
>> Updates:
>> 1. Update to discard invalid records, rather than use an alert message,
>> per the requirements in section 4.1.2.7, RFC 6374.
>>
Please find comments in line...
On 5/27/2015 3:42 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Yes, we exchanged emails after this above one. I will follow up your
latest one later today.
Sin
On 05/22/2015 12:41 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8043758/webrev.latest/
Updates:
1. Update to discard invalid records, rather than use an alert message,
per the requirements in section 4.1.2.7, RFC 6374.
2. Update to use a base test class, simplify the test cas
Please review the changes for JEP 166:
In this webrev, I have updated test certificate fields to reflect proper test
data.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/bhanu/8048830/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Bhanu
From: Bhanu Prakash Gopularam
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 8:43 PM
To: security-dev
On 27/05/2015 23:42, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Since you have reverted the java.security to keep the classname, to avoid
causing merge conflict to jimage refresh, let’s remove the M
On 05/28/2015 08:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 27/05/15 21:35, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>
>> How much of the montgomery multiply and sqaure are you planning to
>> intrinsify? Are you doing the whole thing or just portions of the
>> operations similar to multiplyToLen and squareToLen?
>
> I'm do
On 27/05/15 21:35, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
> How much of the montgomery multiply and sqaure are you planning to
> intrinsify? Are you doing the whole thing or just portions of the
> operations similar to multiplyToLen and squareToLen?
I'm doing the whole montgomery multiply and square operation
