Re: RFR JDK-8134364: Add defensive copies to get/set methods for OCSPNonceExtension

2015-08-28 Thread Jamil Nimeh
Hello all, I've removed the CertAttrSet interface from OCSPNonceExtension and trimmed away a few unneeded methods. As a result the class is immutable now. JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134364 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8134364/webrev.01 Thanks, -

Re: [9] RFR: 8048601: Tests for JCE crypto ciphers

2015-08-28 Thread Valerie Peng
Ok, looks good. Thanks, Valerie On 8/25/2015 1:10 PM, Rajan Halade wrote: Hi Valerie, Thanks for comments! I have fixed all of them. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048601/webrev.01/ - Rajan On 8/20/15 4:19 PM, Valerie Peng wrote: Rajan, Here are some comments for the other half of th

Re: RE : RFR 8044199: tests for RSA keys and key specifications

2015-08-28 Thread Valerie Peng
Hi Tristan, Mostly fine, just 2 more nits: 1) KeySizeTest: the @test and @bug are still on the same line. 2) SpecTest.java: the @run command from line 40 - 45 still have the old name, e.g. KeyModulusTest? I think u need to match them. Thanks, Valerie On 8/20/2015 9:31 AM, Tristan Yan wrote: T

Re: RfR JDK-8134456 java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failing on several platforms

2015-08-28 Thread Sean Mullan
On 08/28/2015 10:53 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: On 8/27/15 10:04 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: >Yes one review is enough to push to jdk9/dev (until later in the development cycle). > >Your change looks fine to me. What about the question Sean asked about CheckPackageMatching? I think that test is passi

Re: RfR JDK-8134456 java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failing on several platforms

2015-08-28 Thread Pete Brunet
On 8/27/15 10:04 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: > Yes one review is enough to push to jdk9/dev (until later in the development > cycle). > > Your change looks fine to me. What about the question Sean asked about > CheckPackageMatching? I think that test is passing. Sean/Mandy, Is there someone who wo