I have a question related.
There are some places in JDK that use doPrivileged to read "os.name" etc. This
system property is in the default java.policy file
> On May 2, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> This is not an issue in your changes, but the current javadoc for
> Version.current
> On May 10, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
> On 5/10/2016 12:16 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
>> You're going to hate me, but shouldn't this be checking the Provider
>> rather than the OS when trying to determine which test to ignore?
>>
> It's more accurate to check the provider, too.
>
Security-dev,
If we can live with "engine=keystore" happily, why not just make the whole
string lowercase and search for "permission=java.io.filepermission"? I don't
think there are permission types or URL names that are only different in cases.
Although file names are case-sensitive in Unix, I
Hi,
While testing for the attached regex changes, a fatal vm init error was
triggered for test
case with -Djava.security.debug=xyz turned on, as showed in following
stacktrace.
It appears sun.security.util.Debug is being initialized even before the
lambda is ready
for use, and unfortunately
> On May 6, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> Please review this fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150468:
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8150468/webrev.00/
>
> The fix is to record bad policy files as they are parsed and ignore them
> during any sub
Looks fine to me except a minor comment.
PolicyParser.java
=
1366 return i18nMessage != null ? i18nMessage : form.format(source);
May be nice to set the i18nMessage if it is not set yet.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 5/7/2016 2:43 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review this fix for
> https
On 5/10/2016 12:16 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
> You're going to hate me, but shouldn't this be checking the Provider
> rather than the OS when trying to determine which test to ignore?
>
It's more accurate to check the provider, too.
- if (!System.getProperty("os.name").equals("SunOS")) {
+ i
You're going to hate me, but shouldn't this be checking the Provider
rather than the OS when trying to determine which test to ignore?
Mike
On 5/9/2016 10:36 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Updated to ignore the test on Solaris only:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8154344/webrev.01/
Thanks,
This looks good.
Thanks
Max
> 在 2016年5月9日，22:36，Xuelei Fan 写道：
>
> Updated to ignore the test on Solaris only:
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8154344/webrev.01/
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
>
>> On 5/8/2016 7:59 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> I still want the rest part (public key checking) ge
Updated to ignore the test on Solaris only:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8154344/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 5/8/2016 7:59 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> I still want the rest part (public key checking) get executed and
> noticed. I will keep track of the evaluation of the underlying platfo
10 matches
Mail list logo
