Ok.
Xuelei
On 12/14/2016 9:54 PM, John Jiang wrote:
Hi,
javax/net/ssl/DTLS/PacketLossRetransmission.java has failed for several
times on macosx-x64 platform. It should put it into ProblemList.
Please review the below patch:
diff -r 49b3d6d9b4df test/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/ProblemList.txt
Hi,
javax/net/ssl/DTLS/PacketLossRetransmission.java has failed for several
times on macosx-x64 platform. It should put it into ProblemList.
Please review the below patch:
diff -r 49b3d6d9b4df test/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/ProblemList.txtThu Dec 15 10:47:46 2016 +0530
+++ b/test/ProblemL
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 12/14/2016 12:13 AM, John Jiang wrote:
Because of the push for JDK-8170329, the patch has to depend on the new
SSLSocketTemplate.
Please review the new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjiang/8164595/webrev.02/
Best regards,
John Jiang
On 2016/11/23 13:
7680 itself is 192 bits, and for any bitLength greater than 7680 I treat it as
in a "higher" level.
--Max
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I noticed in the existing code: Is the comment "256 bits" referring to the
> 'comparable strength'?
>
> # if (bitLen
Hello,
I noticed in the existing code: Is the comment "256 bits" referring to the
'comparable strength'?
# if (bitLength > 7680) { // 256 bits
If so, it seems misleading, according to table 2 this would be 192 bit. Maybe
this can be corrected, removed or the meaning of the comment clarified.
Gru
Because of the push for JDK-8170329, the patch has to depend on the new
SSLSocketTemplate.
Please review the new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjiang/8164595/webrev.02/
Best regards,
John Jiang
On 2016/11/23 13:38, John Jiang wrote:
Please review this patch. Thanks!
John Jiang
On 20
