Hi Max,
In general, looks okay.
Would it be better if it called redirectInput() only if the response
file exists? keytool() method might also delete the response file after
reading it. These two measures may prevent situations when the response
file is unnecessary used.
What do you think?
On 01/19/2017 09:40 PM, Artem Smotrakov wrote:
Hi Max,
In general, looks okay.
Would it be better if it called redirectInput() only if the response
file exists? keytool() method might also delete the response file after
reading it. These two measures may prevent situations when the response
f
Another one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173035
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029904)
Remove com.sun.security.auth.callback.DialogCallbackHandler
`com.sun.security.auth.callback.DialogCallbackHandler` has been
removed in JDK 9. This class, in the JDK-specific exte
My last attempt to solve this problem didn't work because some classes
needed for string formatting were not loaded by init level 3 in some
cases. So I had to backtrack and try a different approach.
This patch avoids localization and message formatting when the VM is not
booted. In this case,
Hello all,
Please review this one release note that documents a change in behavior
for the Subject class and it's underlying SecureSet collections:
Original bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015081
Release note: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173069
Text of the release
Hi Sean,
Would you please review this debug log update for JSSE key manager
implementation:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8173066/webrev.00/
Trivial update, no new regression test.
Thanks,
Xuelei
Looks good. Thanks for the quick turn around.
regards,
Sean.
On 19/01/2017 17:37, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi Sean,
Would you please review this debug log update for JSSE key manager
implementation:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8173066/webrev.00/
Trivial update, no new regression test.
On 1/18/2017 6:40 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173011
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029995)
accept yes/no for boolean krb5.conf settings
krb5.conf now accepts "yes" or "no" for boolean-valued settings.
Looks fine to me. May be nice to state "y
Hi,
I need a review to rename the jdk.crypto.token to jdk.crypto.cryptoki.
This is to change what 8171202 had done to the original
jdk.crypto.pkcs11 module. For those not familiar with discussions
elsewhere, the term "token" is confusing and unclear as it can mean many
things cryptographical
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Anthony Scarpino
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need a review to rename the jdk.crypto.token to jdk.crypto.cryptoki. This
> is to change what 8171202 had done to the original jdk.crypto.pkcs11 module.
> For those not familiar with discussions elsewhere, the term "tok
Similar problem about the rename. rename or addremove (likely) should
work, but hg add/hg remove won't.
To check that all references to jdk.crypto.{token,pkcs11} are gone, I
ran a test over lunch and applied the webrev patches to a clean
workspace. There was a problem applying the jdk webrev
Hi Max, just one nit for JDK-8044085:
The release note is one sentence, but it is a bit of a run-on. It might
be worth breaking it up into two sentences, the first for the
description and the second containing the example.
Aside from that they look good to me.
--Jamil
On 1/18/2017 6:40 PM,
On 01/20/2017 01:57 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
On 1/18/2017 6:40 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173011
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029995)
accept yes/no for boolean krb5.conf settings
krb5.conf now accepts "yes" or "no" for boolean-valued setting
13 matches
Mail list logo
