On 1/30/18 1:19 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Sean,
On 1/30/2018 10:03 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Does Runtime.version().feature() return the same value as the
"java.specification.version" property? (see
sun.security.util.SecurityConstants.PROVIDER_VER).
That is the value that the JDK security provide
Hi Sean,
On 1/30/2018 10:03 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Does Runtime.version().feature() return the same value as the
"java.specification.version" property? (see
sun.security.util.SecurityConstants.PROVIDER_VER).
That is the value that the JDK security providers use as their
version. If not, this
Does Runtime.version().feature() return the same value as the
"java.specification.version" property? (see
sun.security.util.SecurityConstants.PROVIDER_VER).
That is the value that the JDK security providers use as their version.
If not, this test may fail when we bump up the version to 11 and
Hello,
The test
java/security/Provider/ProviderVersionCheck.java
has a version-check that is hard coded; therefore, it has to be updated
with each major JDK update. If the test made its check based on the
runtime version, no explicit update would be needed.
Please review the patch below
+core-libs-dev
On 1/26/2018 4:06 PM, Adam Petcher wrote:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181594
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8181594/webrev.00/
This is a code review for the field arithmetic that will be used in
implementations of X25519/X448 key agreement, the
Hi,
At some revision in the PKCS#11 provider there was introduced checking
of C_GetMechanismInfo min and max sizes.
This has turned out to be a bit fragile. Let me give two real world
examples:
1. Amazon Cloud HSM report minSize and maxSize for EC keys to 0. The
Java PKCS#11 provider will happi
