Re: RFR 8234697: Generate sun.security.util.math.intpoly classes during build

2019-12-04 Thread Weijun Wang
Ping the security side. > On Nov 26, 2019, at 12:36 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > Build change looks good. > > /Erik > > On 2019-11-22 18:59, Weijun Wang wrote: >> Please review the change at >> >>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8234697/webrev.00/ >> >> The new lines in

Re: RFR 8234267: DelegationPermission implementation doesn't completely follow the updated specification

2019-12-04 Thread Weijun Wang
Thanks! > On Dec 5, 2019, at 2:32 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote: > > Looks fine to me. > > Thanks, > Xuelei > > On 12/2/2019 11:15 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: >> Ping again. >>> On Nov 16, 2019, at 10:02 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: >>> >>> Please take a review at >>> >>>

Re: RFR: 8190492: Remove SSLv2Hello and SSLv3 from default enabled TLS protocols

2019-12-04 Thread Bradford Wetmore
In line 601, doesn't this mean that SSL3/SSL20Hello are not longer available as supported, and that you can't turn them back on? Brad On 12/4/2019 1:19 PM, Rajan Halade wrote: May I request you to review following fix which removes SSLv2Hello and SSLv3 from default enabled protocols. SSLv3

RFR: 8190492: Remove SSLv2Hello and SSLv3 from default enabled TLS protocols

2019-12-04 Thread Rajan Halade
May I request you to review following fix which removes SSLv2Hello and SSLv3 from default enabled protocols. SSLv3 has been deprecated with RFC 7568. We have already disabled it by default in 2015 by adding it to the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms property. This fix removes it from default

Re: RFR 8234267: DelegationPermission implementation doesn't completely follow the updated specification

2019-12-04 Thread Xuelei Fan
Looks fine to me. Thanks, Xuelei On 12/2/2019 11:15 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: Ping again. On Nov 16, 2019, at 10:02 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: Please take a review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8234267/webrev.00/ Here, the returnDelims argument of the StringTokenizer is true so that

Re: RFR(S): 8220348: [ntintel] asserts about copying unalinged array

2019-12-04 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Martin, this makes sense. This is the right way to force alignment. I do not like the platform code in the shared file but do not think this is a big deal. +#if defined (_WIN32) && defined (_MSC_VER) Why do you think we need _MSC_VER too? Is OpenJDK on Windows even buildable with anything

RE: RFR(S): 8220348: [ntintel] asserts about copying unalinged array

2019-12-04 Thread Langer, Christoph
Hi Martin, thanks for looking into this and coming up with this patch. The test failures were quite annoying  In hotspot, there is coding to define a macro "ATTRIBUTE_ALIGNED(x)". I'd rather like to see that we define such a macro in the JDK code as well and use it. I think it would make the

Re: SunPKCS11 connection lost after Decrypt doFinal (noPadding) openjdk 8_232

2019-12-04 Thread Seán Coffey
Also, which JDK distro version of 8 are you using ? Note that the OpenJDK version has an extra few pkcs11 fixes in OpenJDK in this area (compared to the Oracle JDK 8 Updates) - Below being some of those : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216597