On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:57:19 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
> **isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks could
> be found
>
> [here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
1) This is un-necessary churn.
2) I
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:04:48 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
> I have in mind dozens of improvements all over the code like this one.
That sounds scary. Broad updates like these cause unnecessary churn in the
codebase, and can make merging and back
porting harder. Changes should be discussed
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:49:44 GMT, Philippe Marschall
wrote:
>> Hello, newbie here
>>
>> I picked JDK-8138732 to work on because it has a "starter" label and I
>> believe I understand what to do.
>>
>> - I tried to update the copyright year to 2020 in every file.
>> - I decided to change
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:58:09 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Could someone please help review this RFE?
>
> Enhance default JDK providers except SunPKCS11 with signatures using SHA-3
> family of digests. SunPKCS11 provider will
> be updated separately (JDK-8242332).
> This changes covers SUN,
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:58:09 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Could someone please help review this RFE?
>
> Enhance default JDK providers except SunPKCS11 with signatures using SHA-3
> family of digests. SunPKCS11 provider will
> be updated separately (JDK-8242332).
> This changes covers SUN,
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:50:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> 14 cc'd mailing lists is unworkable. You need to be subscribed to lists to
>> post, but even if you are a reply-all will
>> be delayed due to all of the mails being held up for moderator approval due
>> to:
>> " Too many recipients to
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:58:09 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Could someone please help review this RFE?
>
> Enhance default JDK providers except SunPKCS11 with signatures using SHA-3
> family of digests. SunPKCS11 provider will
> be updated separately (JDK-8242332).
> This changes covers SUN,
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:53:10 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> @dholmes-ora raises a good point. Hopefully there is a balance point between
>> a dozen different bugs / pull requests
>> each targeting one area and one bug / PR targeting a dozen separate areas. I
>> don't have a good general rule to
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:18:51 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This should be broken up to deal with the files in different functional
>> areas under different bugids and PRs. Otherwise
>> the cross-posting to so many lists is prohibitive. Files in different areas
>> need to be reviewed by
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:21:28 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> The code in java.base was updated to use String::isEmpty in JDK 12
>> (JDK-8215281). There was follow-up in JDK 13 to do
>> the same in the java.desktop module (JDK-8223237). Changing the remaining
>> usages make sense although I see
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:21:28 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> The code in java.base was updated to use String::isEmpty in JDK 12
>> (JDK-8215281). There was follow-up in JDK 13 to do
>> the same in the java.desktop module (JDK-8223237). Changing the remaining
>> usages make sense although I see
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:40:15 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> @kevinrushforth thanks. Done.
>>
>> Similar issues:
>> https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8215014
>> https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8251246
>>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:47:35 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
>> Before this Enhancement can be formally reviewed, you will need a JBS bug
>> ID. If you are already working with a
>> Committer or Reviewer in the `jdk` project who has agreed to sponsor your
>> change, they can file the
**isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks could
be found
[here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
-
Commit messages:
- Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/doom369/jdk into
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:08:15 GMT, thatsIch
wrote:
>> **isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks
>> could be found
>>
>> [here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
>
> @doom369 jcheck requires an associated
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:57:48 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
>> @doom369 jcheck requires an associated issue
>
> @mrserb hello. Thanks for the review. Any further actions required from me?
Before this Enhancement can be formally reviewed, you will need a JBS bug ID.
If you are already working
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:21:44 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> @mrserb hello. Thanks for the review. Any further actions required from me?
>
> Before this Enhancement can be formally reviewed, you will need a JBS bug ID.
> If you are already working with a
> Committer or Reviewer in the `jdk`
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:57:19 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
> **isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks could
> be found
>
> [here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:57:19 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
> **isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks could
> be found
>
> [here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
@doom369 jcheck requires an associated
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:49:44 GMT, Philippe Marschall
wrote:
>> Hello, newbie here
>>
>> I picked JDK-8138732 to work on because it has a "starter" label and I
>> believe I understand what to do.
>>
>> - I tried to update the copyright year to 2020 in every file.
>> - I decided to change
20 matches
Mail list logo
