On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:10:34 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>> Looks good, i wondered why the performance results were so slow then i
>> looked more closely and saw "-Xint" was used. I
>> usually don't ascribe much value to micro benchmarks run in interpreter only
>> mode, but hey any shaving off s
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 20:22:55 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
> 8253821: Improve ByteBuffer performance with GCM
I'd like a review of this change. They are two performance improvements to
AES-GCM, the larger being the usage with
ByteBuffers. Below are the details of the change and are listed in
8253821: Improve ByteBuffer performance with GCM
-
Commit messages:
- comments, dead code, change maxlen tp 1k
- remove debug line
- removing comments and unused method
- Moved into Git
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/411/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 20:38:40 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Plumb new internal static factory method to trust the array passed in,
>> avoiding unnecessary copying. JMH results for
>> the benchmark show about 15% improvement for the cases that were optimized,
>> namely the 3 to 10 fixed arg cases.
>>
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 00:13:28 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> Plumb new internal static factory method to trust the array passed in,
> avoiding unnecessary copying. JMH results for
> the benchmark show about 15% improvement for the cases that were optimized,
> namely the 3 to 10 fixed arg cases.
> # V
