On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:50:36 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
> `java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:41:12 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Anyone can help review this somewhat trivial fix? The main change is inside
> src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/native/libj2pkcs11/p11_objmgmt.c. This is to
> help better troubleshooting by reporting the type of unavailable attributes
> in
Anyone can help review this somewhat trivial fix? The main change is inside
src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/native/libj2pkcs11/p11_objmgmt.c. This is to help
better troubleshooting by reporting the type of unavailable attributes in
PKCS11 exception message when C_GetAttributeValue(...) call
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:50:36 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
> `java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Two comments:
1. Why not reuse the existing variable
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:50:36 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
> `java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Two comments:
1. Why not reuse the existing variable
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:50:36 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
> `java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
This change will restrict JARs signed with SHA-1 algorithms and treat them as
if they were unsigned. This applies to the algorithms used to digest, sign, and
optionally timestamp the JAR. It also applies to the signature and digest
algorithms of the certificates in the certificate chain of the
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:50:36 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
> `java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Changes look good, except for the unneeded
Hi Alexey,
I'm in the process of reviewing it.
--Jamil
On 4/26/21 4:24 AM, Alexey Bakhtin wrote:
Hi Jamil, Norman,
I’ve missed this thread discussing JDK-8241248 issue.
Recently I have suggested a fix for this issue :
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3664
Regards
Alexey
On 26 Apr 2021,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:51:19 GMT, Alexey Bakhtin wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Could you please review the fix for the JDK-8241248?
> The issue happens during the TLSv1.3 handshake without server stateless
> session resumption in case of server receives several parallel requests with
> the same
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 09:45:15 GMT, YassinHajaj
wrote:
>> src/java.naming/share/classes/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapPoolManager.java line
>> 400:
>>
>>> 398: private static final String getProperty(final String propName,
>>> final String defVal) {
>>> 399: PrivilegedAction pa = () ->
Hi Jamil, Norman,
I’ve missed this thread discussing JDK-8241248 issue.
Recently I have suggested a fix for this issue :
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3664
Regards
Alexey
> On 26 Apr 2021, at 11:31, Norman Maurer wrote:
>
> Sorry for the noise but is there any update ? The bug makes it
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the
`java.security` package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8265426: Update java.security to use instanceof pattern variable
Changes:
Sorry for the noise but is there any update ? The bug makes it “impossible” for
us to enable caching by default as it may cause issues on the remote peer which
are hard to debug.
Bye
Norman
> On 19. Mar 2021, at 16:34, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>
> Hi Norman, I've been working a couple other bugs,
14 matches
Mail list logo
