I can re-license some code that decorates Concurrent collections with
references, so you can do this without blocking.
https://pfirmstone.github.io/JGDMS/jgdms-collections/apidocs/index.html
On 9/06/2021 4:31 am, Alan Bateman wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:22:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
I thou
On Fri, 21 May 2021 18:37:12 GMT, Jack Hartstein
wrote:
> This change is part of a larger code cleanup effort and removes the term
> "hack" out of several files in the jdk.
> JBS: [](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240997 )
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 58a5
Apologies in advance if this seems like paranoid security.
As you are likely now aware, we have been using SecurityManager a little
differently than recommended as we adapted it to our requirements.
Sometimes it's not always easy to explain or obvious why something is
done in a certain way.
On Fri, 21 May 2021 18:37:12 GMT, Jack Hartstein
wrote:
> This change is part of a larger code cleanup effort and removes the term
> "hack" out of several files in the jdk.
> JBS: [](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240997 )
Marked as reviewed by xuelei (Reviewer).
-
PR
On Fri, 21 May 2021 18:37:12 GMT, Jack Hartstein
wrote:
> This change is part of a larger code cleanup effort and removes the term
> "hack" out of several files in the jdk.
> JBS: [](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240997 )
Hi,
Please send me an e-mail at dalibor.to...@oracle.com s
This change is part of a larger code cleanup effort and removes the term
"hack" out of several files in the jdk.
JBS: [](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240997 )
-
Commit messages:
- 8240997: Remove more hack word in security codes
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/j
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:22:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> I thought about that but not sure of performance impact. Is the worst
>>> problem that more than one warnings will be printed for a single caller?
>>> It's not really harmless.
>>>
>>> As for the frame, if the warning message only contain
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:15:29 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> I thought about that but not sure of performance impact. Is the worst
>> problem that more than one warnings will be printed for a single caller?
>> It's not really harmless.
>>
>> As for the frame, if the warning message only contain the
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:22:52 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> I thought about that but not sure of performance impact. Is the worst problem
> that more than one warnings will be printed for a single caller? It's not
> really harmless.
>
> As for the frame, if the warning message only contain the calle
ParamsTest is an interop test between keytool <-> openssl. There are some
manual steps listed in jdk/sun/security/pkcs12/params/README to perform after
the execution of jtreg execution. So this test is to perform that manual steps.
-
Commit messages:
- 8266182: Create a manual test
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:11:17 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> More loudly and precise warning messages when a security manager is either
>> enabled at startup or installed at runtime.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/System.java line 331:
>
>> 329:
>> 330: // Remember original System.er
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:41:11 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > You might want to make your "WARNING" consistent with the VM's "Warning" so
> > that OutputAnalyzer's logic to ignore warnings will automatically ignore
> > these too.
>
> The uppercase "WARNING" is intentional here, it was the same with
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:42:53 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> More loudly and precise warning messages when a security manager is either
> enabled at startup or installed at runtime.
Changes to LoggerFinderLoaderTest look reasonable to me.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4400
13 matches
Mail list logo
