> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285263 Minor cleanup could be done
> in java.security
>
> JDK-8273046 is the umbrella bug for this bug. The changes were too large for
> a single code review, so it was decided to split into smaller chunks. This is
> one such chunk:
>
> open/src/jav
On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:23:06 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> (But ForceGC is a heavyweight blunt instrument. It creates a new Cleaner for
> every instance and an instance can only be used once. Also, its minimum
> wait/sleep time is 1 second, that's a lng time.).
I thought about something simila
> Please review this fix to the XML Signature implementation to check for null
> or missing DSA parameters and throw a MarshalException before trying to
> create a DSA public key from its XML encoding. This will allow the code to
> fail earlier and not depend on the underlying provider to detect
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:29:02 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review this fix to the XML Signature implementation to check for null
> or missing DSA parameters and throw a MarshalException before trying to
> create a DSA public key from its XML encoding. This will allow the code to
> fail earl
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:29:02 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review this fix to the XML Signature implementation to check for null
> or missing DSA parameters and throw a MarshalException before trying to
> create a DSA public key from its XML encoding. This will allow the code to
> fail earl
On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:45 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I have the test case update reviewed?
>
> This patch is trying to use ForceGC for cleaner test cases. As would make
> the test more stable and easier to maintain.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
The usage looks fine.
(But Force
Hi,
May I have the test case update reviewed?
This patch is trying to use ForceGC for cleaner test cases. As would make the
test more stable and easier to maintain.
Thanks,
Xuelei
-
Commit messages:
- 8286045: Use ForceGC for cleaner test cases
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java
