On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:11:18 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Max, can you please help review this fix? It updates the two jarsigner tests
> which are added to the main trunk during the code review of JDK-8267319.
>
> Mach5 run succeeds.
> Thanks,
> Valerie
Is this fix going to be integrated soon? W
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 13:00:50 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Please review this change to fully support RFC 6125 in the TLS
>> implementation. This change forbids wildcard domains in TLS certificates
>> unless the wildcard is in the left-most component. Certificates of this
>> nature should be rare
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:22:54 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> A couple of trivial ProblemListings:
>
> JDK-8279529 ProblemList
> java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/ManySourcesAndTargets.java on macosx-aarch64
> JDK-8279532 ProblemList
> sun/security/
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:39:16 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>> A couple of trivial ProblemListings:
>>
>> JDK-8279529 ProblemList
>> java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/ManySourcesAndTargets.java on
>> macosx-aarch64
>> JDK-8279532 ProblemList
>> sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/NoInvalidateSocketExcept
A couple of trivial ProblemListings:
JDK-8279529 ProblemList
java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/ManySourcesAndTargets.java on macosx-aarch64
JDK-8279532 ProblemList
sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/NoInvalidateSocketException.java
-
Commit messages:
- 8279532: ProblemList
sun/secur
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:20:30 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
> CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific
> PSS signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The
> fix is
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:20:30 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
> CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific
> PSS signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The
> fix is
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:28:33 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
Thumbs up!
Thanks for doing this sync forward.
-
Marked as reviewed by dcubed (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4484
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 15:56:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> A trivial fix to ProblemList
>> sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
>> on macOS-X64 and Linux-aarch64. It is already ProblemListed on linux-x64.
>
> Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
@RogerRiggs an
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:35:32 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> A trivial fix to ProblemList
> sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
> on macOS-X64 and Linux-aarch64. It is already ProblemListed on linux-x64.
This pull request has now been i
A trivial fix to ProblemList
sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
on macOS-X64 and Linux-aarch64. It is already ProblemListed on linux-x64.
-
Commit messages:
- Change 'linux-generic' -> 'linux-all'.
- 8265890: ProblemList
sun/security/ssl/SSLSock
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:09:48 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> A trivial fix to ProblemList
>> sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
>> on linux-x64
>
> Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
@RogerRiggs - Thanks for the blazingly fast review!
-
PR: http
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:04:26 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> A trivial fix to ProblemList
> sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
> on linux-x64
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d0f3cc92
Author: Daniel D. Daugherty
URL:
A trivial fix to ProblemList
sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java
on linux-x64
-
Commit messages:
- 8264656: ProblemList
sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java on
linux-x64
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 06:44:12 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this dull patch that replaces `ClassFileInstaller`
>> w/ `jdk.test.lib.helpers.ClassFileInstaller` in all jtreg test descriptions
>> to ensure we won't get split testlibrary, and removes
>> `jdk/te
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:59:08 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote:
>> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>>
>> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
>> windows/aarch64.
>>
>> Major changes are in:
>> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:41:16 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> A trivial fix to ProblemList these two tests on Linux:
>
> sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProcWithMD5.java
> sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProc.java
>
> We're rolling machines over to Linux 8.3
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:50:37 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> A trivial fix to ProblemList these two tests on Linux:
>>
>> sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProcWithMD5.java
>> sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProc.java
>>
>> We're rolling machines over to Linux 8.3 and these two tests are s
A trivial fix to ProblemList these two tests on Linux:
sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProcWithMD5.java
sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProc.java
We're rolling machines over to Linux 8.3 and these two tests are starting
to fail in the CI in Tier2 (so far). So we need to reduce the noi
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:25:28 GMT, Volker Simonis wrote:
> [JDK-8237578](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237578) caused a few
> internal and external tests to fail (see
> [JDK-8259572](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259572)).
>
> Backout [JDK-8237578](https://bugs.openjdk.j
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:56:00 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a quick review for two changes. The primary is a failure that shows
> up on linux-aarch64 because the systems do
> not have NSS. The default was to allow all curves tested, which before the
> native library removal w
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:37:25 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
>> Looks like a trivial change to me.
>
> @iklam - thanks for the fast review.
Tony - sorry about that. The last time I checked your bug (about 2 hours ago)
it wasn't "in progress". Please update your fix
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:15:01 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> Reduce noise in CI Tier2 by ProblemListing this test.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 9150b902
Author: Daniel D. Daugherty
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/9150b902
Stats: 2 lines
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:32:57 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by iklam (Reviewer).
>
> Looks like a trivial change to me.
@iklam - thanks for the fast review.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/362
Reduce noise in CI Tier2 by ProblemListing this test.
-
Commit messages:
- Add 'aarch64' to the generic-ARCH comment so folks know what to use.
- Use the correct bug ID: 8253637.
- 8253659: ProblemList sun/security/ec/TestEC.java on linux-aarch64
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:15:01 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> Reduce noise in CI Tier2 by ProblemListing this test.
My Tier2 test job ran sun/security/ec/TestEC.java on all regular Oracle
platforms except for linux-aarch64. I also updated the generic-ARCH
header comment to include '
Thumbs up. I agree that this is a trivial fix.
Dan
On 6/26/20 4:48 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Please review this trivial change which reenables the tests which were problem
listed because of a linux-aarch64 machine configuration issue which has since
been fixed:
Note: I intend to push this t
uming 'linux-aarch64' is correct, this looks ok to me.
As an aside, we are looking at a possible configuration problem in our
test environment that is not linking the host RNG to the VMs. I'm
hoping these can come off soon.
Brad
On 6/19/2020 10:07 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wro
Greetings,
In order to reduce the noise in the JDK15 and JDK16 CIs, I'm ProblemListing
some crypto tests on linux-aarch64.
JDK-8247876 ProblemList various crypto tests on aarch64
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247876
Here's the associated product bug:
JDK-8247359 SecureR
Thumbs up!
Thanks for handling this.
Dan
On 3/6/20 12:31 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Please review this change to ProblemList 70 security tests while we
diagnose the artifactory issues.
See https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240684 for more info.
diff -r 1c40993361d0 test/jdk/ProblemList
30 matches
Mail list logo
