Hi Alexey - I was trying to understand the fix for the "Unexpected number of
plaintext bytes” issue.
But it appears that the earlier iterations of the webrevs have disappeared,
only webrev.5 is available in [1]
In the future it would be a good practice, to retain all the webrevs for
sometime.
Hi Alexey,
Good catch, this kinda answers my question wrt. "Escape from Alcatraz” comment.
I vaguely remembered some discussions around this in the Mantis/Tiger era in
the Deployment team.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4836493
The reason I was asking for a regression test, are all t
v-requ...@openjdk.java.net<mailto:security-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net>
wrote:
I will look into the issue.
BTW, I closed JDK-8239788 as duplicate of JDK-8239798.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 2/21/2020 9:24 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi security-folk,
At VMware while upgrading our application to OpenJDK
an you please evaluate this at the earliest, this is a serious show stopper
for VMware.
Thank
Kumar Srinivasan
VMware
Hi Jon,
I looked at the stylesheet can the descriptive comments for each of the
classes be moved closer to the class itself, ie. just before the
definition ?
Kumar
This is an updated review for the changes to improve tables in java.base.
The changes incorporate earlier review feedback, an
+1
Kumar
On 5/1/2017 1:55 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Looks good to me.
--Sean
On 5/1/17 4:19 PM, Brad R. Wetmore wrote:
Kumar (+ anyone else),
Simple review for fixing two errors when building javadocs with -private
(non-default option).
Also, the 'name' attribute is no longer supported in HT
The changes look ok to me, however I am wondering if the module
could be called jdk.unpack200 and not jdk.pack200 ? since it
contains only the unpacker, and the bin utilities are pack200 and
unpack200.
Kumar
On 3/4/2015 5:13 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
As listed in an open issue in JEP 200:
The jdk
Thanks for fixing this so quickly, the build appears to be fine now.
Kumar
On 5/29/2014 3:09 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Changes look good.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 05/29/14 13:39, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Thanks Valerie!
On 30.05.2014 0:09, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
1) Since we are rol
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, was on vacation...comment inlined.
Hi, here is a webrev[1] for some cleanup that i want to integrated in
tl-repositories.
Alan Bateman had scanned the changes and gave me some good input[3]
for further discussion here:
The changes to java.util.concurrent should go t
Changeset: de45eac5670e
Author:ksrini
Date: 2009-11-20 11:01 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/de45eac5670e
6367077: Purge LD_LIBRARY_PATH usage from the launcher
6899834: (launcher) remove the solaris libjvm.so symlink
Summary: Fixes other related issues as well
10 matches
Mail list logo
