Re: [8u] RFR: 8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension

2021-05-19 Thread Andrew Hughes
On 12:23 Tue 20 Apr , Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi, > > Please review this OpenJDK 8u backport of the certificate_authorities > extensionj. The OpenJDK 11u patch didn't apply cleanly after path > unshuffeling, but was fairly trivial to resolve. Conflicts caused by: > > 1. X509Authentication.ja

Re: Ping? [8u] RFR: 8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension

2021-05-10 Thread Mario Torre
Hi Severin, I went through the patch and it looks good to me. Cheers, Mario On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:13 PM Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > Hi! > > Would anyone be willing to review this? > > Many thanks in advance! > > Cheers, > Severin > > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 17:24 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:

Re: Ping? [8u] RFR: 8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension

2021-05-10 Thread Severin Gehwolf
Hi! Would anyone be willing to review this? Many thanks in advance! Cheers, Severin On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 17:24 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Anyone? > > On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 12:23 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please review this OpenJDK 8u backport of the > > certificate_a

Re: Ping? [8u] RFR: 8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension

2021-04-29 Thread Severin Gehwolf
Anyone? On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 12:23 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi, > > Please review this OpenJDK 8u backport of the certificate_authorities > extensionj. The OpenJDK 11u patch didn't apply cleanly after path > unshuffeling, but was fairly trivial to resolve. Conflicts caused by: > > 1. X50

[8u] RFR: 8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension

2021-04-20 Thread Severin Gehwolf
Hi, Please review this OpenJDK 8u backport of the certificate_authorities extensionj. The OpenJDK 11u patch didn't apply cleanly after path unshuffeling, but was fairly trivial to resolve. Conflicts caused by: 1. X509Authentication.java copyright line conflict only. Resolved manually. 2. SSLCo